OpenSource Products Business Operating Mode Blue Forest http://www.lslnet.com 99 September 11 00:54
Author: Wintereagle
There is a sentence in the capital that "the critique of weapons can not replace the argue". We discuss any Linux problem, no matter whether it is supported, it is also unable to argue with the open standard in Linux. The influence of the industry. We put forward every opinion because I don't want Linux to embark on the wrong road like Java. (As I see this seems to be exploited, I don't know how many shares will be given to me.
In the previous article, the criticism of Linux in business mode is not mean. I hope to go back to the business mode of business model (I don't engage in Linux development and research but I am working on another world-famous OpenSource standard) XML R & D work).
I have said "GNU / GPL is in the line of each word, there is an evil smile and the eating of people." But we should see that this "eating people" in the MS era Bill Gates is absolutely not allowed to have a second pair. However, GNU / GPL gives each of us to use its opportunity. My purpose is to analyze a part of the REDHAT. On the road of Linux, it is the idea of communism. If you don't want money, if you have this idea, we have this idea in our business. The OpenSource industry will lose the driving force. At that time, the lazy people will be more and more people who can do practical things.
Although it said that Redhat still has exploited in business operations. But we can see that the operation mode of Rehat is determined more than the MS way. OpenSource can let a small company get rid of some big companies to encounter publicity promotion Lack of funds, after-sales service, lack of weakness. From the one hand, this way is indeed exploiting our silent people, but we also see his way from the other hand, we also have the lowest to minimize the minimum, so that we all feel Point. And we have much more than we lose more. This approach has alleviated the contradiction between manufacturers and consumers, components and producers, incorporating our software industry into a benign cycle. Only in this kind of commercial environment, our domestic software has such a head. day.
Our domestic software does not have to deliberately imitate Redhat to make great money. But I mean is not to make money, now China's software industry, manufacturers' production and supply and marketing are in a lack of funding difficulties. The key is to use OpNesource's advantages to adjust the relationship between manufacturers and consumers, components and producers. Adjust product development, spread, after-sales service to a higher level, no funds, no good products, no good products Without a fixed user group, no user has no money to make a vicious circle, which is naturally earned.
The critique of the weapon cannot replace the critical weapon, I think no matter how I have criticized OpenSource, I can't shake my belief to OpenSource.
