Original: http://www.donews.net/keep/archive/2004/10/29/154606.aspx
WebLeon said in the comment of "The future search for Yang Zhiyuan" said:
Complete search is to collect additional filters. The current search engine does not have anything in screening. Personalization and intelligence, still staying in enhancement and extension. However, in terms of technology, let search engines understand the reasonable screening of everyone's thoughts, it is a bit difficult.
In fact, it is not just the future of search here, but more here is the future of information organization. The Internet makes information tentacles, and the search engine makes information easier to find. The value of Google is that the chaotic information on the Internet has become an orderly manner through the machine and algorithm. However, the more intelligent machines cannot replace people their own brains, and the different people will have different views in the face of the same information.
Many people are discussing, whether Google's machine news will overcome the artificial editor of Sina. My opinion is that if Sina's news source is roughly consistent with Google's news source, and if Sina's editors, such as what news can be on the headline, what kind of news can be smell, what kind of news can only be put In "more", it can be fully quantized, then it must be replaced by the machine. In fact, most of the work of Sina News is indeed decomposed, quantified, and it seems that it hasn't encountered any crisis, just because the machine's algorithm is not good enough. If Chen Wei goes to the engineer of Google News Chinese Design Algorithm, they must do better.
However, whether it is Sina News, or Google News, their common question is that they imagine users into an abstract person. Zhang San is no longer Zhang San. Li Si is no longer Li Si, they are all the same abstract "user" or "readers". Therefore, they provide an exact same information to thousands of users or readers, and they want to be considered that this information will be suitable for most people. They have stubborn confidence in their own algorithms or editors.
Of course, this confidence is an important prerequisite for their success in a specific period. But the era has changed.
Many new technologies are maturing. Such as P2P technology, social computing technology, mesh technology, etc. These technologies have a common feature that allows access from previous information or resources, and becomes information or resources. The emergence of these technologies is enabling the boundaries between the providers, organizers, and acquisitions.
In the past, today is participating in the provision and organization of information, which has been greatly different from the environment in Google and Sina. If there is no other information screening, I have to accept the way Sina, but if there are many people who have a common interest, why should I accept Sina? For me, Sina is just one of many information filters, or even the most no personality - if you don't say those simple Copy / Paste work equal to the machine.
This is actually 365KEY thinking. Just like through the Bittorrent download file, the more people participating, the greater the value, because the people who contribute resources are much. In 365Key, you can subscribe to the network of people who have fun with you, so that the information you have obtained is not only more personal than Sina, but also more popular than Sina's news editor, such as Sina is hard to put one. The contents of the blog are placed in its news center (outside the wood beauty).
When everyone becomes a motorized node in the information world, this huge live "grid" will produce incredible energy. This depends on technology support, but no longer the technology itself. Information is no longer simply flowing, socialized information organization, so that every information you have obtained is fully customized, because you are the direct participation of the entire information processing process. By.
