In the recent Northern Atlantic Convention Organization to the original Suzhou Land Eastern European aggressive "expansion", Hungary and other three countries have won the "preferred", which is more frequently seen in the news header. Some Chinese newspapers do not recover the old words "Hungary as the descendants of Hungary" when reporting. After the death of Attera, the Hungarian Empire was quickly disintegrated. Although Europeans are used commonly used all kinds of nomads from the East, they are "Hungar", and the future generation of the real homes is unknown. The only thing that is a little evidence is that the Bulgar, Bulgar, Bulgari, who came into the Balkan Peninsula (Bulgar, Bulgari), Magyar. When they appeared in Europe in the second half of the country, the hometown of the real test has disappeared in the historical stage for many years. According to Professor Denis Simor Professor Hungarian History, the Hungarian said that the Hungarian called Hungar is a typical timing. Because there is no historical information indicate that both people have straightforwardly misunderstand Hungary. Hungary is related to Hungar. This is in fact, it is not right. Hungary's original ungari, hongrois, usgri and other forms, the real source is Onogur, that is, Turkic On Oghur, in accordance with Chinese history habits, translation as "ten surnames" (Turkic "ten"; OGHUR is history The famous Turkist name, with Uighur's ancient model back UIGHUR is not related. The Europeans' signs are due to the close contact of the early Madan and Turkician, so that Europeans often follow the Hungarian Mazar people. However, strictly, the Turki is the Altati Department, Hungarian belongs to the Ural System. Both of course can affirm the Mazar's ancestors from the Asian steppe instead of print - European people. I can also see a cultural specificity of the Hungarian today: they may be the only nation in Europe. There are many people think that the European Hungar is the descendant of the Huns (or its Xiqian "in Chinese history). Although many people think that the European hometown is the Huns in Chinese history (or its" West Movement " Even though this is very popular, we must point out in historical research, this is a hypothesis that has never confirmed.
Professor SINOR is also very deeply attacked, and he repeatedly emphasized this in the new "Cambridge's early Asian inland history". Hurious History expert E. A. Thompson last year (1996) Re-edition famous "The Huns" also reaffirmed that when the Hungaro was not referred to, the Huns "Hung Hung is the Huns" this assumption is basically completely established in the approximation of the voice, first by France Scholars de Guignes proposed in the 18th century and there were no other history and archaeological evidence. The main difficulty is because the northern Nero has disappeared between the Hun of China, there is a few centuries between the Hungaro in Europe, plus huge geographic intervals, if there is no direct indirect history or archaeological real thing discovery, light In addition to various or less theory of "Xiongnu as the hometown of Hungaro", speech is actually an important historical document of this century in Xinjiang - "Ancient Sumet Letters" One of the Munes who operated in China mentioned Luoyang to destroy his so-called XWN people. Professor Simor has been in the case. Other problems, this letter also has a controversy: Luoyang in history can say "destroyed in the Xiongnu" twice in history. One is the first year of Emperor Emperor Emperor Emperor Emperor Emperor Emperor Emperor (AD) Dong Zhenzhuo, who was once in Changan, in Luoyang, "Sepsen the Temple of Palace, Government, Home, 2 Bill, Room Buildings, No Red Chicken. "In the Dong Zhuo army," Waiting for the soldiers "(Cai Wei" sad anger "). In fact, later Situ Wang Yai Lin is killed by Dong Zhuo, Dong Zhuo's part is the direct cause of Cai Wei (Cai Wenji) being plundered to the South Xiongnu. The "Three Kingdoms" has a very exciting description of this history. Another time was Jin Huai Emperor Yongjia for five years (311 AD), the Hunshan (AD 319 remembers Zhao Zhao, Shi Zhao Zhao) Lord (Zhan Zhaowu Emperor) Liu Zheng, Liu Wei, General Yong, Wang Yan, Wang Ji, Shiller, etc., to attack Luoyang, excavate the Mausoleum, burn the palace temple, and get the European Hungar is the Hunnel, no confirmation, whether from race or language. From the language, Bai Bird Kuji is the first scholar who is in the history of China's history to categorize the language of the Huns, but he also swims between Turkic and Mongolia. The white bird's conclusions have long been negative from the Altai experts, and his research does not indicate that Turk and Mongolian Altaic have inherited and absorb most vocabulary from the Xiongnu, but they cannot prove that the Xiongnone is one of them. For example, a generation of 雄 主 顿 单 单 名 认 认 认 认 为 为 语 语 语 语 语 语 为 为 即 即 即 即 即 即 即 语 为 语 为 为 为 为 为 为 为 即 为 为 即 即 即 即 即 即 即 即 即Batatu title. But the word is not fully explained in Altati, but in terms of Iran. The Xiongnu does not belong to the Mongolian family today.
