Today, I also visited the bookstore and read the second half of "adaptive". It is more determined to have your own idea: this book is the relics of the .com era, the value is really small.
The only relatively clear thing in the title of the book is that the seventh chapter: Why good project managers will fail. The content, it is proposed that the author thinks that it is wrong, it is to hand over the project to a good project manager, and the opportunity to success is relatively high.
I feel very surprised, so I read this chapter compared. I can't agree with the author.
First, let's talk about something. About the title, in fact, it is not what it means, and the defeat of the soldiers. That point of view, although we can know what he wants to say after reading a whole chapter, but it is too unsyx (I don't know if the author is also a translator's question). First of all, what is a good project manager? Obviously, the project manager for the successful case of the project. Then the argument became: the project manager for the successful opportunity of the project is not high, very fun. Secondly, if the author's point of view, obviously admits: the best way to pick the project manager, not to see his achievements, because this is nothing difference with the throwing, is also very fun. As a "valuable" work, this way to express an opinion that can be used as a chapter, too tiger.
Second, let's leave this, we know that he is actually to express: If the project manager has passed, if it is very good, its future results are likely to be as bad as the footer's project manager. I think, examine an individual, what conclusions are possible. But inspect the overall project manager's overall and footsteps, this conclusion is obviously unacceptable. What is the author's argument? Read the fracture technique described in his text, we can know that the author thinks that the world is dramatically changing (more and more powerful in the future), and the experience of past experience will not be adapted to current and later (1999) software development. The author's adaptive development method must be carried out.
This question is insightful, I can't agree to the author's reason can be said from several aspects. First, look at the preface of this series. The existence of a large number of old qualifications and project managers in India is a strong place than us. Then I can't help but ask: Is it worth the value? Because the world has changed dramatic. If it is, it is obviously ridiculous, and the series introduces an opposite of the idea (this is not a general point of view, but can fully denied the value of the book). If so, what is the reason? Is these indiats that have already mastered their adaptive ways? This is obviously ridiculous. Second, individuals think that this book is completely consistent with 99 years. Completely emphasize speed, changes, and abandonment, it is entirely the product of that era (there are many traces in the book). .com is already in the past, can continue to survive. Most ofcom has been controlled by traditional managers who have ridiculed this book, and the survival status is generally general, and the vast majority of death. It does not believe it. Two examples. First, I later saw the smartest people at the time, all gathered a website and then selling people. The people bought are basically crying (if you can alive), even if you buy AOL, it is the same. The second is to read the Buffett of the wrong network, only apologize for this, and the next few years, it can be as laughing with the past.
Finally, I think the project management and the view of life are actually the same. Although there is excellent employee everywhere, the starting point of any project cannot be assumed to bring a bunch of high-spirited communists. At this level, traditional economic humanities views contain the experience of project management. Inside the individual, I feel that it is recommended. In 2001, I was "the Dash Board" in Zhejiang. In 2002, it was "self-adapt" in the views of the views) "Month", this year deadline". For the discussion of project management, I still insist on the foregoing view: either discuss how to control the process (hypothesis team members are normal ordinary people), or discuss how to make humanity to maximum (not to 120%), Can't be mixed: Say that you find the best process control method, its role is 120% of people, but the premise is that participants must invest 120%. This makes an analytical error that has not had no movement. If you want me to sum up this book, although I am a bit biased, I still want to be better than to be more than saying, such as someone runs with you: "I found a absolutely excellent weapon, give me the best army, I can defeat all the enemies! "You are very excited for this weapon. After careful consideration, I feel that the weapon must be a good army. You decide to promise him, so I asked:" What team you think is the best, so you can use you Weapons? "He replied:" Can defeat all the army! "
How to read the story of a nail soup.
It is a bit different from that it is not very clear. The appraisers were forgiven. In short, I think it is failed to introduce this book. In any case, the gods of "people" "people" "people" have taken test over time, the publishing house should not be collected with the works and the work! Especially: it is more expensive than "people"!
