Some associations about Wiki

xiaoxiao2021-03-06  34

Update: This comment makes me very inspirated: Danladz: If Wikipedia is successful, you will change the habit of your online search. In fact, the information there is already more detailed, and I have been used to searching information there. For example, I want to check

Read what happened on May 3, 1998, whether using Google or using traditional media, it is quite troubles, but use wikipedian, you only use input [May 3, 1998]], it feels very Cool. In fact, I also started to check the information of Wikipedia. For example, I checked Software Engineering information, where the things found there, very quickly. At the same time, Danladz also answered a confusing question: Wiki should not have to worry too much about the problem, because huge visits and long time, enough to make many experts have likely to correct mistakes, this and BBS have essential differences . And compared with traditional media, even if the traditional publications written by authoritarian are not necessarily or accurate. The process of reading is the process of criticism, the so-called book, it is better to not read. Hey, you may not think that it is so clear, but Danlaz can. Wiki also shows a certain advantage in the collection of people's wisdom, you can't think of it, he thinks, and writing there let everyone see.

Wikimedia starts more subpredal after Wikipedia successfully, there are wikibooks, wikiquote, wikisource. where wikisource is a bit not understood, maybe he wants to do something similar to Internet Archive, National Security Archive, and give an example, here Put the famous speeches of history from the year. Here is an example of wikibooklinux related books. The project is just beginning, and the content is less.

Google's Catalog Search is your own Putting the Catalog's things on the web. His purpose is mainly to achieve all the information you can imagine by searching engines. According to Wikipedia, this gesture is now developed. If it is well developed, you can organize a lot of useful information. One day, it is like we now with Google, we will use wikipedia to find information. And Wikipedia's information is better than Google's information organization.

In fact, you can imagine that Google is an alternative wiki. We write online every day, Google has taken the initiative to put it up, not like wiki, but every network writer, especially bloggers, not Googlewiki Editor ? You write knowledge in your own blogger just to edit an article for Googlewiki. You write knowledge to Wikipedia. It is to edit a article for Wikipedia, compared to it, the latter may be better, in Google, There are a lot of repetitive and useless information, it takes time. If your article ranks on page 10, then good things, people can't find it, and in wikipedia, your knowledge can always be fast and accurate. Find, and other free editorial assistance, continuous evolving and updating.

From this perspective, search engines are still not the best information organization. The best information organization may be Wiki. You can try to use Wikipedia, so you can understand it and know it and deficiencies. Holding a devout heart, imagine a weddy wiki, then how good, maybe MIT's OCW project should have some kind of cooperation with WikiBook, so that web freedom information is constantly growing.

Perhaps you can imagine another blogger's way, for example, you are a historian, you do some feelings and records on your own blogger, can you have the habit of editing on Wikipedia, find the area of ​​your research, such as a clear history, Then edit your new understanding on Wikipedia, then briefly introduce on your Blogger, and then apply the link on Wikipedia. As a result, the reader reads you with a piece of clear history, then reached the clear history of Wikipedia, but it not only reads your article, but also the information about the clear history of others is also close, like words. You can read it enough. The web is a messy world that connects through LINK. Wiki is nothing more than people in disorders, an ideal web should be messy unordered the unordered world plus an orderly huge Wiki's orderly world. These two opposite worlds are also symbiotic in the Web, which is quite simple and harmonious in the black and white in the Taiji map.

转载请注明原文地址:https://www.9cbs.com/read-61760.html

New Post(0)