The author is 20 years old. It is a third-level student of a university. It is engaged in software development since the second day. The third-level three-level, high school pass the four levels, and the two highways have passed the system. This year passed the system analyst. There are more than 50 articles in the newspapers, participate in and develop more than ten systems, and have obtained various rewards many times.
Preface:
January 10, 2003, perhaps a day that always worth commemoration. I received a good news this day, I successfully passed the national software qualification and level test - the system analyst level exam, and this is a hard-working result for me only 20 years old. Perhaps because I am the smallest system analyst in the country, maybe this exam will be surprised once. There are also many online colleagues that have sent E-mail or congratulate me on the forum. While I am happy, I also think that I can successfully take the system analyst exam in succession in 2001, this is not open to my usual efforts and a lot of experience in 9 years. Of course, I also play a good luck with me and a little good luck. Many peers and friends have let me write my own experience and feel. I think if I can really write something to let you learn the role, then I will be worthy of value, I will feel very happy. of. If there is something wrong, I sincerely hope that the masters can give criticism and refer to it. After all, I still have to learn a lot to everyone. Let me talk about my experience.
text:
I believe that everyone has a certain understanding of the system analyst exam, I will briefly introduce it here. The system analyst exam is the "National Software Qualification and Level Examination System Analyst". In its outline, "The qualified personnel through this exam has the actual work ability and business level of computer application system, and can guide the system designer". The content of the examination is divided into three parts: comprehensive knowledge of computer and software engineering, systematic analysis design, systematic analysis and design. The first partial examination time is 150 minutes, and the content is based on the basics of computer and software engineering and the latest knowledge of the latest technology. The second partial examination time is 90 minutes, and the content is mainly based on systematic analysis and design methods in specific practices. The third part of the test time is 120 minutes, and the content is mainly based on the paper in a narrative process.
Top exam outline and the contents of these three parts, I have drawn this conclusion: The system analyst exams want to pass, in principle, at least three qualities: first, there is a very solid computer basic knowledge and software engineering Knowledge level; Second, there have been a formal software development experience in many years and participate in the analysis, design and implementation of the main part; third, there is a strong ability to track international and domestic advanced technology and have good communication, management, Expression and other capabilities.
It should be said that the difficulty of this exam is still very large, this is no doubt. I remember that the person who participated in the proposition said that this exam life question group had considerable levels, the difficulty and content of the topic were objective for assessing the above three aspects, and in principle, students did not develop experiences were not allowed. . What I want here is that I have just been big three this year. According to the principle, I can't pass it, but I have been engaged in independent software development work from the second day, so far, I have developed a large and small 30 software projects. Most of them are applied in various units. And I have already formed a development team called YY Studio and served as the head of the head. I think this has played an important role in the success of the exam. So if I let me say, I think the first is experience, the second is level, the third is luck. Everyone must pay attention to the accumulation of experience, which is more prominent for system analysts.
What is mentioned above is all levels and capabilities that should be used as a system analyst, but I think many people want to improve their own level through exam, so I will talk about the test. Experience. Of course, I never advocate the exam to "Meng", such a test does not make sense, purely into the exam and do not learn any knowledge. I advocate that everyone is based on full practice and learning, and then improves themselves through the exam, and the knowledge learned and the ability to master this form is most useful. First of all, I think the preparation time of the exam should be set for 1 year. Because too little, I can't grasp it for some knowledge that needs practice and digestion. And 1 year should be allocated, I am all assigned. The first half of the year is mainly based on comprehensive reading and understanding new technologies. This stage basically does not take the problem of testing, but put all the minds all in learning. The main task is to master the basic knowledge and carry out the movement of new knowledge of new knowledge. Because the system analyst exam does not have a specified tutorial, the outline requirements are too wide, so basic knowledge is mainly based on the tutorial of the advanced programmer exam, and it is necessary to see the software engineering book, such as Professor Zheng. Software Engineering (Advanced) "," Practical Software Engineering ", etc. At the same time, please refer to some project cases to analyze good experience in software engineering implementation. This part must not be underestimated, it is the foundation of the entire review, the top priority. If you think it is necessary, you can also participate in some related training courses.
The time for the second half of the year is very close, and it must be reasonably utilized. I advocated the second half of the year to four months and after two months. The main task of the first 4 months is to learn and consolidate the knowledge of learning, while paying special attention to collect and organize some new technologies and new theoretical results. My method is to find some unclear technology or theoretical content, such as: CMM, CRM, ERP, OA, etc. These usually say but not understand nouns. This time will have a feeling, I feel that I know too little, and I am on the book, there will be a kind of psychological activity that is afraid and unconscious. But if you want to look at this problem correctly, you will handle the pressure changes. I thought this time: It is because I have a solid foundation, I can find that I have a lot of questions that I don't understand, I don't understand, can you improve it? If I don't have the basic knowledge of the previous period, how can I know if I still don't understand? After a period of understanding and learning, you will slowly feel many articles that you don't understand, you can understand, and you can express your own point of view. At this time, you have reached a new level, continue to work hard, success is not far :)
The last two months is the stage of sprint, is a big training for the previous mastery, and it is also the best time to check the degradation. Be sure to cherish and make full use of these two months! These two months of tasks are mainly for the test questions of previous years. By experiencing their own shortcomings, they will understand these issues through the book or online query. Do not pay special attention to the way, don't blindly do one year, you must pay attention to classification and summary, every year, you can say that this year is mainly examined, you can use these knowledge points Classification statistics on a piece of paper, and say that in this training, how is it, how to solve it next. I think that only the requirements have been achieved, such a test is effective. Don't do too much, I think it is enough to do near 4 or 5 years. If you don't have a very particularly abundant time, you don't have to take a dozen years ago, because the development of the computer is 2 or 3 years, see the previous old questions will only delay your precious review time, no Too much benefit.
There is also a major job in these two months to train my second part of the system analysis design. Because this part is a special practice to master their answer methods and answer skills, we must focus on exercises. This part of the topic is in principle, as long as there is time, it can be said that the number should be 20 or more (ie the top 3 years to 4 years before training). Why do you have such a lot of training? Mainly because this part of the content is not very good, and you will find yourself in the process of the answer, but you always say that you can't say it, you can't say some ideas. on. This is normal, the solution is more practice. In particular, I want to specifically tell the last ten-day review method, and its importance is self-evident. These ten days must take the test questions before, and then cover the answer and then do it again, see if it is really understanding. And this ten days I think it is the most appropriate. Because you have learned in the past for nearly 1 year, there are many things that I want to say, I want to express my own papers, and I have a lot of feelings written. Such exercises will have a great help to the paper in the exam. The paper must time when practicing, it is best to compress the time to 110 minutes. This is mainly considering that there is a time to check the wrong word and wait for the wrong word, so there is no harm in advance. Don't use your computer when you write, use it as a paper, this is very important! I have to know that I have written my own hand on the examination room, so this exercise is usually carried out. The topic is based on the topic of the past 2 years. It doesn't have to write, write it yourself familiar and have a lot of words. The most important thing is to have experienced or at least to see and understand, There is your own thoughts in it, I can't be a science, so you are equal to can't get it! After writing, repeatedly read the corresponding essay, comparison to find shortcomings.
OK, the experience of review before the test I can think of this now, this is basically a generalized experience, and some specific deployments have been conducted from the strategy of the exam. Of course, I feel that there are still some skills. I didn't talk about the tactical things. I will explain some of the topics and specific review methods for different phases. Let all the preparations should be examined and have not been taken this time. The peers can have some reference in the year of continuing to work. I also hope that if you think I am still that thing, there is also a reference value, you can let me encourage me, my E-mail is
Compking@21cn.com, I will continue to hear your opinions and write better; if I think I said something wrong, I hope you can tell me, I will further improve.
