Personal research on the content management system is a little scared.
Some of the features of each system will be different due to different target users. For something that does not involve too many core technologies, saying that it is real, where can you find your needs, if he allows him to customize development according to your needs?
Basically, the domestic content management system can be divided into three categories:
The first category, for the government, media, ICP, large enterprises, characteristics are more people, there is much lower level, but the demand is more clear, it is to do the website, do various types of information release, require maturation Product level solution. Corresponding products are:
TurboCMS
Www.turbocms.com According to version, the price is between 50,000 to 250,000
TRS WCM
Www.trs.com.cn price is about 150,000 permission
CMS4i
Www.chinabyte.net/ The price is around 100,000, but it is said that it is not done, only the Chongqing market is
Dragons
Www.qianlong.com, according to the version, the price is between 20,000 to 80,000
The second category, for the administration, institutions, internal and external network applications, characteristics, large demand, large gaps, content management is only part of a large system, such as a small piece of content in e-government . Generally requiring customization during implementation, it is impossible to meet demand with ready-to-developed products. Such solutions are:
Fang Zhengxiang Yu
Tsinghua Wanbo
WITS
Zhongguancun software
Wait.
Most of their background is integrated solution providers. The price is not accurate. In a project, it may be very cheap, tens of thousands of pieces, or hundreds of thousands of millions, you can see if the customer has no money.
The third category, facing business, personal, feature is the user's enthusiasts, likes to study. The demand may be more complicated, for example, if you need to integrate with BBS, user registration, etc., meet personalized needs, preferably have source code, you can modify itself as needed. There is a lot of this type of solution market. But personal thinking, AC is absolutely among the leaders, it feels like AC's design ideas, many places very close to TurboCMS, but lack of business operations, may miss the need for many details of users. The price is generally within thousands of pieces.
In the case of the third category, as a user, the individual feels that choosing a content management system to see several criteria:
First, easy to use, you can't represent editing, if they don't use it, I will find you to do technical support every day, I am not exhausted. In this regard, TurboCMS and TRS WCM have advantages, and their customers have hundreds of thousands, and the products have been developed by 4 to 5 years, and all aspects have been very thoughtful.
Second, flexibility, buying a system is to use foot, enough to manage all channels of the entire website. In this regard, TurboCMS can set the extension field for each channel, and the TRS WCM can set the extension field for the site, it is better. Template processing engine technology, TurboCMS uses script technology, TRS WCM uses TagLib technology, and then combines visualization template production technology, it is not bad, can meet the needs of both ease of use and flexibility.
Third, scalability, today I bought this set of systems, I have to carry out new business tomorrow, I hope to use it. TurboCMS provides a database deployment tool to copy content to an external database for use, such as copying to the Web for advanced queries. This is done very well like AC. However, TRS and the sky are not, only a static page can only be generated. Users want to query the database, so there is only to put the CMS with the Web together, very unsafe. This feature, I feel that turboCMS is studying foreign interwoven, Interwoven has a DATADEPLOY. Fourth, automatic content collection, the acquisition of external data source collection, reducing manual intervention. TurboCMS has three automatic acquisition reptiles, database acquisition, web acquisition, file acquisition. TRS WCM provides a separate product "Network Radar" to implement web acquisition, and another product is called "Database Gateway" to achieve content from the external database, and then import TRS own files. These two are doing well, but TRS wants to buy, the total price is 45 million.
Fifth, the full text of the station. TRS provides a separate product to do site retrieval, and TRS WCM can be well integrated. In addition, several systems don't have their own systems, need to integrate with third parties. By the way, if some intelligent processing, such as automatic related articles, automatic summary, automatic keyword extraction, TRS has a stand-alone toolbag called TRS CKM knowledge management kit, very powerful, and other families have no more than. If you need to say, you have to consider, but you can purchase it separately.
Sixth, special features. TurboCMS provides specialized management, page management, journal management, newspaper management modules to support special content release forms. There is no other than other many other thanks.
Seventh, support for the process. TRS's workflow can be graphically customized. TurboCMS can be customized based on users. Other products seem to be supported.
In terms of price, TurboCMS and TRS are the most expensive, but this morning, I saw the offer with a rebate from IM286, I don't know that it is not true.
In addition, many people have found that they are similar to the system, personal feelings, the domestic products are really much enough, and there is nothing benefit blindly, it is better to open up new battlefields. I now study knowledge management, more than content management, Herch.
Interested everyone can discuss it.
