The new book of the blog view "Beyond the traditional software development" is a good book, very small software engineering methodological works can make me read so happy. The three authors say that they are in the actual introduction of China XP, quite a pride of "the truth that is quasi-in-the-style and the specific actual practicalness of China". I am trying to drink like this.
One advantage of a good book is that it is able to be re-enabled. I don't know how many times I have seen a narrative similar to "Difficulties in Demand Changes in Software" has become numb. But when I saw this book repeated this discussion, I was suddenly sensitive to the big brain that was in the previous discovery, and I doubt my heart.
Almost all software engineering methods have more frequently changed demand as the most terrible devil, concentrate most of the firepower to attack this huge behemoth. Since these new methods and ideas are almost from the United States, I may believe that in the US software development, the changes in demand are really a severe problem, but in China, I think it is worth analysis.
To analyze, spend some energy, do some investigations, maybe the results, this shore is the same as the other side, the change is really the evil situation of China and the United States and the software people, that is very good, we will study hard. up. But it may also be not exactly, maybe China's software industry has its own unique problem. If this is true, then we should be like Mao Zedong in that year, to explore our own solutions according to our own problems?
I have no investigation research, but I envishable this scene. If the country wants to develop its own CAD software, all the funds, please come on the gourd painting, completely rewrite an AutoCAD, do not need to innovate, do not mention any new needs, just let you have a valid time, full but limited resource After you completely override an autocad, do you not do it?
In such a virtual scene, the demand is frozen, and the change is blocked. As a developer, what do you face is just a pure technology and engineering challenge, how many people have a confidence? If we can't do it, what is the reason?
I have to think about it.
