Insert
Professionalization: Creativity: Personal Investment and Salary [Understand the Operation Mechanism and Purpose of Enterprise: Common and Effective Maximum Acquisition of Wealth] Quality Problem: [Contrast Football] Demand is clearly encoded [big knife king five] first start to make a chaos Labor results. Data security, consistency and shared considerations] Do not talk to customers [annoyance], simple results. Pay attention to customers' opinions and guide customers to go to their own programs [mitigation] How to collaborate [ Technology needs human language to express communication, writing skills] Confidence [for software, inappropriate hardware knowledge is very helpful.] // Overall management: Control Change range management: Work Decomposition Time Management: Key Work Path //
Technical Theory: [Technology is necessary, learning conversion technology is the most important. (Transformation is a lot of factors, you must satisfaction, not the best solution, product needs mature technology, not high-tech.)] Technical personnel It is sensitive, and the company is not sensitive to technology. This is a very contradictory place, but you must realize that people in decision-making companies are not IT people, but managers. Because investment is risky. The value of software is ideological, The code itself is worthless, ERP reflects management ideas, I must have the concept of management. Through "ERP doesn't have to wait for death", the reason is analyzed: technology has no fuzzy concept [] said nothing to say, is literature, telling the literature Unclear, clear is science
I emphasize that the basic skills must be solid. The technology must be mastered in 3-5 years. Evaluation criteria: [Ability: Solution] Be good at finding the root cause of the problem occurred. [Mastering the new technology: no more than one month]
Self-smelling programmer programmers are different from martial arts, we don't worship the mistakes of the evil master of computer education: never pay attention to quality, most bachelor, master, doctoral do not understand software quality, do not know how to effectively improve software Quality. Quality of college graduates C / C programming test: What is the programming of the program: programmers who can have long-term stable programming for programming masters: can have long-term stable to write high difficult, high quality Programmer
In particular, the basic algorithm is class. At present, there is often a problem. I don't know how to solve it. I think it is mainly the basic skill. I don't know where to analyze. Of course, I don't think about it. It is the operation of the entire system. Understand, and this rely on the basic skills of myself. So I think it should be learned from the operating system [Although there is no time, can you pick it up? Don't blindly learn new technology.
VBX, OLE, OCX, ActiveX, COM, COM are from its predecessors, only basic skills, and the assault is valid.
Productization: It is necessary to mature technology. It is not high-tech. It reflects human design than emphasizing the superior function. [Fool interface makes product life for a long time] Run maintenance service is the first. [I want to reduce time in the way) Open version upgrade and troubleshoot) rather than refused customers] confidential measures make products are legally protected.
Size problem: Software size decision development method. Role play [demand analysis, system analysis, program design, test point] small software goals are maintenance. [Focus 1. Guarantee Quality (Fist) Key 2. Document Description Clear] [Word] You can draw sketches, as long as you explain the problem]
Large software involves multi-person collaboration to familiarity with UML language is relatively high [people's brain is unreliable, the formation of documents, the notepad may.] [Assurance communication with the user's interaction communication] [Development group member regularly discussed] [use Use examples to communicate with customers]
Suggestions on the company: 1. Emblem construction: cannot rely on a specific person or group. 2.
