Help a friend Jacques Lebrun Post a post, by means of some readers who are too excited: When you open criticism, have you ever thought that there is no criticism? Of course, the peacock open criticism no one can stop. However, there is an old saying that you have a root onion, you really have you taking you with a sauce?
"The purpose of book review is to let commentators say something to a book that I have seen or haven't seen. The comment is only guided in a sense, that is, it is the reader of the book review - including the author of the original - Provided some information about the intelligence of the commentator, or the information about its character, no longer, there are two things. "- VV Nabokov
Many people complain that my article is always too long. But I believe this time, I can almost free from this accusation because I don't want to pay back to "the moon myth: a soybean book review" (almost forgot Said, I happened to be the author), because as the famous Russian said, the comments have nothing to do with the original, can only expose the commentator's martial arts and wisdom. So even if I pay a three-way form in the form of a response, I can't explain that I am much higher than someone else, but I can only get in a homogeneous cycle.
Yes, it is not like many people believe that comments are not destroyed (Morris Brown Scholar, just like breakfast in the cold). Amazon's online bookstore maintained a huge reader comment, I have been curious about this practice - doing the average intelligence of the reader group of a particular book. Do those stars, roses, and eggs really have "guiding role"? The public is really higher than the individual, and the statistics are really higher than a clear "1"? However, if the industrial sour is on the hour, the fatal corrosion may not be known. The following content is mainly to clarify some specific facts. For the book reviews that have not read a long book review, please ask not to look down: this is just a layer of antiplic acid film I prepared for my own clock.
About three months ago (early November 2002), an article named "Moon Myth: One Bean Try Try" was first in IBM DevWorks China website. The completion of the article is to be traced back to a holiday earlier: a few do not worry morning and some interesting friends have promoted this impromptu, the original purpose is just to share some personal opinions in the small circle (similar to people telling a joke) . The response after reading after reading compensates the pain of typing. One weekend at the end of October, completely attempted ("Book Review" on the DevWorks page made me mistakenly thought that they also actively solicited similar manuscripts), send originals to devworks. The process after the dazzling acceleration, after a few days, I found my own graffiti on that respectable website - editors and professionalism.
Many careers are unconsciously completed (Bolhers said when receiving the college English lecture, "I have nothing to do in the unintentionally"). My book review is originally based only on the English version of the book. At that time, the news launched by the Chinese version seems to be as constant as Messiah, but the article is not written by it. The writing process has not been contacted in the "Organization" of the book (but the book review potential The reader also includes a friend who asked the book below. Therefore, when the Chinese version of the book is officially launched, 文 has become an important promotional product, the development of things is my unnecessary. According to IBM DevWorks, the article is "exclusive", which is "exclusive" in the published website, and then "From DevWorks China" words should be indicated. As far as I know Umlchina website, IBM licenses were obtained on Xprogrammer. The article is published, and it is like the prodigal and left home. It can only be handed over to social education. Some merchants ask to go to the promotion, but I have not indicated the source, I personally can't be responsible. The original name of this child is as shown above, as for "soft jade fragrance", the original is only a sentence in the text, I also don't be responsible for the "art name" that is good for the good people. In addition, some places let it go to seat, respect as "special book review", this "special" process, I personally don't know, I can't be responsible. It should be noted that in addition to any of IBM dev-Works China, I have not received any remuneration, only Tsinghua University Press has sent a Chinese translation of a piece of frame, and has a lot of color to my study. In other words, it is the book review itself, not I personally cooperate with the sales of Chinese translation. My writing happens to this process independently, and (revealing a secret) I happen to work for a living (regardless of software development is also a general sense of writing), and I have not obtained any benefits from the sale of the book. (Do not consider Decoration factors in the study room). Maybe the quality of the book reviews is considered, and the independent comment is a more desirable form.
In addition, according to my personal judgment, this book comes to no promotion talent. It is said that it is a competent salesman, and it is a nightmarer. When you talk, it prefer to ridicule, memories, the flow is still interrupted from time to time. Details of those that are complicated, free in facts, and infinite self-replication are its favorite illegal condiments. It is happy to emphasize the content (in fact) - although there is a surface decoration of all scientific literature - limited to orthodox software projects, it is limited to the rushing pragmators and provocations. Some people were unfortunately irritated, but I was not my originality - when I was written, the length of the potential readers in my brain did not have any common situations.
The article received a lot of feedback after the publication. From this, I also got a chance to communicate with many peers. Several enthusiastic readers have always kept communicating with me - this is the best reward that authors can be expected, which is far more practical than the festival. I also often received "Hello, how to download the book electronic version", maybe I should go to this, specialize in electronic publication?
For purely curiosity, when someone told me that the online bookstore and programmer community were reproduced in this article, I also began to pay attention to people in these places from time to time. Like Amazon, I am surprised by the sharpness and writing of "netizens" thinking. However, I still believe in Naobova's famous saying, we have nothing to do with Brooks my work, the network is only a more open stage, and each loneliness in the crowd has a certain sense of self-sufficiency and self. Reflectivity. However, my above believes partially by a disappointing Chinese translation reader. After complaining that the book "No Imagination is good", he / she said that "it is really a resentment for the stinky article written by the special book. In order to fight for a little manuscript, it is, it is, the end (SiC) ). " Maybe I should also clarify it again? As mentioned above, the book review target reader is my friend and IBM DevWorks visitors for IBM DevWorks (perhaps with umlchina). Even if it is discussed the vulgar economic problem, this disappointed is not the object I pay for it, and for free users, "EULA" in the software industry can also work here: "That's more" words, no One word is said to him / she listened, he / her resentment should give himself.
What I am still furnished is when "Disddrency" read this book review? If you read it before he read this, then "the stinky and long article" is not scared to read his enthusiasm, I don't want to call "愧 (取 幸 'meaning)"; if it is read, then after reading I read it, I was disappointed, and why did you endure this? " In a word, let the disappointed people see this book review, this is me and (hey, this mediocrity "and") he / her party's misfortune.
The first task of this article has been completed - I believe this is enough to clarify the home world and economic source, avoid further misunderstanding and disappointment - just like philosophers love, it wrote so much, the actual problem solved So less - I hope that the enemy of this article has been defeated once again, and it is no longer looking down.
The second task is relatively simple (previously did it). As a departure from the family, this book review is not only a manner, but it doesn't care. In the beginning, Nietzsche, even more than this madman's philosopher himself: "... Mein Ehrgeiz Ist, in Zehn Saetzen Zu Sagen, Was Jeder Andre IN Einem Buche Sagt, - Was Jeder Andre In Einem Buche Nicht Sagt ... ", Nietzsche only wants to say that others can use" a book "in" ten words "to say clear. Because I diligently and unreliable memories, the original text has toned "Ten" and "One". I hope that the great sentence that I invented will not be another slam. One day, I will return to my door in another weird name.
