Each of us listens to music according to its own different appreciation. However, in order to facilitate the analysis, if I still divide the whole process of listening to music into several components, then it is more clear. In a sense, we listen to music in three different stages. Due to the lack of appropriate terms, these three stages may be referred to as: (1) aesthetic stage; (2) expression phase; (3) pure music stage. Mechanically divide the appreciation process into these assumptions, the only advantage is that there is a relatively clear concept of listening. The easiest way to listen to music is to listen to the fun of the sound, this is a beautiful stage. Listening to music at this stage, don't need any way, when we don't do something, open the radio, you can't immerse it in the sound. At this time, the infectivity of the music can bring us unconscious, but it is a charming mood. You may be sitting in the house at the moment. Imagine a sound on the piano, this sound can immediately change the atmosphere of the room - prove that the sound ingredient of music is a powerful and mysterious power, who is laughing or smashing this, who will look very stupid. Surprisingly, many have developed a bad music habit since it is a qualified music enthusiast. They went to listen to the concert, in order to forget themselves, put the music as a kind of comfort or relief. They have entered an ideal world, in which people don't need to think about the reality in daily life. Of course they don't think about music. Music allows them to leave music and bring them to a fantasy realm. This fantasy is caused by music, which is about music, but they don't listen to music. Yes, the infectivity of music sound is a powerful and original power, but you should not let it occupy in an inappropriate location in your interest, the beauty stage has a very important position in music, but this is not All the questions. There is no need to be too far from the beautiful stage. Music infection is self-evident for every normal person. However, there is a more sensitive problem with different sound materials used in different composers. Because not all composers use the same way to use sound material. Don't think that the value of music is equivalent to the extent of it, and don't think that the best music is written by the greatest composers. If this is true, Raweell should be a more great creative Bbere. The problem is that the way composer uses audio elements vary from person to person, and he has formed a part of his style in the way of use, which must be considered when listening to music. Therefore, readers can see that even in this primary stage of music is listening to music, it is worth taking more conscious listening. Listen to the second stage of music, that is, I said. Here we will immediately encounter the problem of argument. Composer tends to avoid discussion on the content of the performance of music, Stravsky is not claiming his work is "object", "things", "things", and in addition to its own pure music Do you have any other meaning? His uncompromising attitude may be based on such a fact: there are so many people trying to explain all kinds of works. God knows that you want to use your own explanation to accurately, clearly, and ultimately clear what is the meaning of a musical work so that everyone is satisfied. But should not cause another extreme, that is, denying the right to "expression". I think that all music has fault, some, some weak, all of which have some meaning behind, and this meaning has constituted the content of the work. All issues can be simply described in the following question and answer: "Is there a meaning of music?" My answer is: "Some". "Can you clear this meaning with a speech?" My answer is: "can't". This is the crux. Those simple people will never be satisfied with the answer to the second question.
They always hope that music has a meaning, this kind of meaning is more and more, and they love it. Herens think of a train, a storm, a funeral or any other music that is more familiar, they feel the performance. This kind of popular concept that has meaning of music - usually excited and instigated by ordinary music commentators - should be corrected anytime, anywhere. Once, a timid lady confessed to me that she worried that her music has a serious flaw because she can't linked music with some clear things. This is of course the leading back of the whole problem. However, the problem still exists. How much is the wise music enthusiasts that require any works to have a clear meaning? I said, it is just a general concept. At different moments, music expresss peace or filmost emotions, regrets or victory, angry or joyful emotions. It expresses every emotion and many other emotions, which can even express the meaning of appropriate words in any language. In this case, the musician likes to say that music is only the meaning of pure music. They sometimes even further say that all music is only the meaning of pure music. Their true meaning is to say that there is no proper speech to express the meaning of music, and even if you can find it, it is not necessary to find it. But regardless of the professional music worker, most of the people who begin schools still have to formulate clear words to illustrate their reactions to music. Therefore, he still always feels "understanding" Tchaikovsky is easier than "understanding" Beethoven. First, the clear meaning of a piece of music to the Tchaikovski is much easier than that of Beethoven, which is much easier. In particular, when the Russian composer, whenever you go back to a piece of music, it almost always tells you the same thing; and you want to say that Chicen Dove is talking about It is often very difficult. Any musicians will tell you, this is why Beethoven is a great composer. Because each time I said that the same internal feelings will soon become a boring music; and every time you listen to a slightly different songs have a stronger vitality. If possible, you may wish to listen to forty-eight in the Bach "Average Law Piano Collection". A topic picks up a subject. Soon you will realize that every topic reflects a different emotion. You will soon realize that the theme is pleasing, it is difficult to find the words that make you completely satisfied with it. Yes, you certainly know that it is still happy or sorrowful. In other words, around this topic can form an emotional frame in its own mind. Now further study the sorrowful theme and try to grab its exact sorrow. Is the sorrow of pessimism or the sorrow of the heavens; is it a fatishable sorrow? Let us assume that you are very lucky now, you can use many words to make yourself satisfied, but this doesn't guarantee that others are satisfied, others don't have to be satisfied. It is important that everyone can feel the characteristics expressed by themselves or the topic. If it is an artistic masterpiece, whenever you listen to it, you should expect that it means exactly the same thing. Of course, theme or music does not only express an emotion. Taking the first main topic of "Ninth Symphony" as an example, it is obvious that it is made of different components, and it is not just one thing in the narrative. However, no matter who listened to it, there will be a feeling of power immediately, a powerful feeling. This feeling is not just a powerful sound of playing. This is the power inherent in the subject itself. The extraordinary power of this theme and vitality gave the impression of the audience as a strong statement. But never try to bring it to "the hammer of life", and so on. This is where the trouble began. Musicians say that music is nothing out in an irritation, rather than professional music workers, is too anxiously eager to explain the meaning of the meaning of this song. The reader may now know more about what I said is indeed a meaning, but you can't use a lot of words to explain what it is. The third stage of listening to music is the stage of pure music.
