Free flipping web page, see this news "Red Flag Linux is confused by independent intellectual property operating system" (http://www.9cbs.net/news/newstopic/15/15958.shtml). Oh, I suddenly felt a bit funny, but after laughing, I was a little inexplicably sorrow ...
"There are two purposes of the red flag, one is for national information security, our country needs such an operating system with its own independent intellectual property, and the operating system is the cornerstone of the entire national software industry; The reason is that the country is for economic purposes, it is also for anti-monopoly needs. Otherwise, software development can only be developed on the Windows platform, and the price is high. "This is the interpretation of the Sino-Science Red Flag Agent President Zhao Xiaoliang's origin of the Red Flag Linux . Feeling is really good, "Red Flag", just like the name of the name, build the first aircraft carrier of the Chinese operating system.
Question: Why do we need "operating system with its own independent intellectual property"
Comparison has been "using a foreign, especially the operating system produced by US manufacturers, is dangerous from the perspective of economic, information security, military, etc." "So" for economic purposes "," for antitrust " Need "We all need" operating system with its own independent intellectual property ". At first glance, this does not seem to be reasonable. But think about it, even if there is a big friction between China and the United States, will it work for individuals who use the computer? I don't know, if the cable is broken, what is the relationship between we use Windows or linux? What is the relationship between the RedHat or Hongqi? The critical computers used by some departments of the relationship between the national lifeblock are not PCs, and the operating system is not the operating system used by the PC computer. And we spend money here, what is the meaning of our PC operating system? Is it just to prove to the world "Chinese people are very powerful!"? "Operating system with its own independent intellectual property" is inevitably remembered that the cold war thinking, and this and globalization seem to be lacking.
So what do we need? I am not to develop "Operating System with Irself Independent Intellectual Property" is not good, but millions of people who have been invested only to develop a system that is very similar to Windows. Where is the independent intellectual property? Is it a file storage format? Or CPU usage? Is the independent intellectual property? Is that a very beautiful interface? If this is, it is better to invest in the capital money into the basic education, maybe the overall quality of the whole people will be more meaningful than the "operating system with its own independent intellectual property".
"We believe that the state's support for this industry is still not enough, bringing great difficulties to the development of enterprises." "Only the technology needs of the market is true technology. Searly from the market, it is impossible to form a benign From the use of improved technology to meet the complete sections needed for customers. The business path is right. "Zhao Xiaoliang said.
Question: What kind of role should the Government should be used? What is the market?
Maybe I am lonely, this Zhao people are 许 神 神 I can't say, but he has a little crying. The state should "support", "the technology needs the technology is the real technology", "So, the leading force is the country or the market? My point of view: The industry that needs to support the country is a fight that can't help! Just like Zhao said: "There is only the technology that needs to be real technology. It is not possible to form a benign, from the use of improvement technology to meet the needs of customers. The road to commercialization is Yes. "So is" real technology "for" operating system with its own independent intellectual property ", is it" the technology of the market "that needs the market to test. Regrettably, Zhao people will not completely fail to fade in "The country's support of this industry is still far enough." Zhao Yi complained that "now contradictory is concentrated in two points: First, although the government support is still strong, the actual help is still not enough, we hope to be greater, the attitude is more distinct. The government's support fund is not too dispersed. Quasi-enterprise, more concentrated investment, the effect may be better; second, the government should not be very eager to be very good, don't invest some money, I expect to go out the benefits, because the market can only say that during the preheating, there is no mature, China Software Enterprises also take time. "
Question: Is this the main contradiction?
I watched him complained that I couldn't help but laugh, this is no different from your mouth. These two contradictions are more straightforward, "Now contradictory is two points: First, although the government still gives some money, the actual money is still not enough, we hope to give more money, and It is not necessary. The government's support funds don't give others, give us Hongqi, effect? Maybe, of course, there may be no; its second, the government wants to make a profit, the blood is inevitable, because this market How do we don't know, we have to burn more money. "The original" main contradiction "is understood by Zhao people to understand the lack of money. How many thousands of research funds can be established a year of 20 million research funds? Can you solve how many people's upper school problems? I don't know, but I believe that if the money is put into these tops, it is better than brought "the operating system with yourself independent intellectual property"!
Linux is in China, in fact, there are many ways, but it seems that it is not good. How much contribution to these companies who reached out to the country? What does it cost to study so much money? Oh, maybe those free Linux societies have more statements.
Linux is in China ... What should I go?
