Please stop manufacturing second-hand smoke and stop sending .doc files. This is not a technical problem; this is a common problem. This website respects visitors to choose the freedom of browsers, never sell its products for a particular manufacturer, and become a monopoly helper. This page is organized by TIDY and strives to maintain a W3C's XHTML 1.0 specification.
Good citizens don't help you illegally copy - please stop spread. DOC file ("I don't have to .doc" 2004 version) published in ITHOME Computer report 2004 Old Edition URL:
http://www.cyut.edu.tw/~ckhung/a/c_91.shtml
Not a technical problem, it is a common problem!
You will see this article, it may be because of me, often in order to receive .doc, .xls, .ppt files; it may be because you send it .doc, .xls, .ppt file Others' troubles, the victims thus propose gentle rational protests to you by sending this article.
Forcing others to accept these closed file formats, just like manufacturing second-hand smoke,
Not a technical problem, but a common problem, it is a social issue. It is a pity that most people in the past do not know, so even the police officers who invade the cases of smart property rights, or teach students to respect others, abide by the laws / history / citizen morality / ... teachers, all to deliver .doc or.ppt The way in which the way is involved in encouraging / forced illegal copies in unconscious. Even if the past is, I don't know if I want to finish this article, you can learn that "spreading enclosed file format" is the same as "manufacturing second-hand smoke", even more serious harm.
"What are you talking about? Everyone uses MS Word to exchange information with .doc files, how can this be hurt society, what is the behavior of others?" First, not everyone uses MS Word. The visually impairment cannot use MS Word; there are many gladiators (double significance) based on important considerations such as security and long-term preservation, and do not dare to use MS Word. Second, even legitimate MS Word users, may not use the same version as you, and the incompatibility problem between Word's different versions, sometimes larger than the incompatible problem between other companies! When you will .doc When the file is sent to others, and when the recipient can't open, what do you suggest? In order to open the file you sent, should he want to buy Microsoft software? And should he have to buy a new version? Or you think he should be like most people, don't you get illegal copy? You are forcing him to buy Microsoft products, or forced him to illegally copy it? Finally,
If a behavior hurts others / does not comply with social justice, it is not because many people are doing it, it will become an acceptable thing. Before the year, "everyone" manufactures second-hand smoke in a closed public place, so everyone should succeed in the second hand? I used to "everyone" discriminated against my mind, indifferent to the body disorder, so we should let go of this Social phenomenon always exists?
Allow different, is the compatibility
Panasonic's VCD Player receives Datong TV, isn't the same can be seen? Received the sound of Kenwood, isn't the same can be listened? Received a record of Sony? Isn't the same video? Nokia's mobile phone called Motorolla, Tai Gao Can users call Chunghwa Telecom users? Is it possible to talk? Then why Microsoft's Word spit out of the data, can only be read with Microsoft products, is there a satisfactory effect? Different brands of recording and fuse / VCD / The expander / TV / speaker can be used together with the transmission line, freely combines home audio and video theater; different manufacturers of mobile phones, different telecommunications service system users can talk to each other or briefed. As long as the industry abides by the rules of the game, according to
Open, universal, not belonging to an open standard for any company, you can
Although it is not the same, it is compatible. [1] The elasticity of the software is larger than the hardware. There is no reason to require higher if there is no reason to come from the same vendor and even the same version can be compatible. If the manufacturer tells consumers: everyone must use
The same text processing software, data exchange can
Compatible, it is deception. If the manufacturer tells consumers: Other label software supports poor file format of this software (for example, after opening, the layout sample) is a technical issue of other manufacturers, that is deception.
This is not a technical problem of others, but a social problem that enclosing file format manufacturers to deliberately created.
We are being monopoly and conflicting push software vendors to deceive us, that is because it hopes to monopolize; if retailers deceive us, it is because it is also attached to the big factory to make money. But our consumers are unable to obtain benefits, and don't want to see any manufacturer to the monopoly market, let us lose choices. Why should we join a common deception, a common forced ranks, and create more victims? Why do we want to tell the recipients in action? "In order to read my letters, you must use a certain brand, a certain version of the text processing software Otherwise, it is not possible to compatibility. When we enhance the enclosed file format, it will not help the monopoly forces. When we don't have economic ability to purchase legitimate Word, we are not encourage illegal Copy? If the victim is willing to go back to the head to help the hurt? "For the tiger", the original impression of this idiom, here is the best interpretation!
But please don't lock the focus on you and I am two or three people, just treat these words as a recipient or author for the accuse of the sender. That is not the focus. Please pull the focal length, repeat how much you happen on you, see how this national movement is malignant? See if everyone is compromising with the environment, because of their own damage to society. Very small. Not care, what will be there? A "lucky letter" garbage letter creates more garbage letters, is not terrible? A greedy mouse member attracts more people to join the mouse, is not terrible? A virus swallow healthy cells Isn't it terrible as a material that has been proloned more viruses? So, then, please repeat ten times, the victim is from 1 2 and 8 and 16, ... readers can see its enlargement effect Do we look at the spread of the .DOC file, it is also true. The number of victims increased from one person to a thousand people, and even millions of people, and only this scene repeated ten times.
This picture seems to point the spear to the government's central government, that is just because they have a big influence; but from the distance, whether it is the upper reaches or other omitted business, universities, religion and charity groups ..., every person who insists on send / spread .doc files, is in order to promote monopoly and illegal copying, more terrible is that this meager power will be unknowing or If you don't care, after ten times, I am magnified, reaching thousands of times the effect! Every participant is a good friend of Microsoft and piracy! This is not said that when Microsoft's good friend is wrong, we do everyone It is a good friend of some of the profit groups. Just, a person who insists on sending / spreading .doc file, a society that is tolerant, this unethical,
What is the position to criticize Microsoft monopoly? Is there any position to accuse illegal copy? If there is no conscious / courage / determination, it is impossible to defend the rights and interests in public opinion and reason, and only a wishfulness to think that existing problems. The law can correct monopoly and illegal copying phenomenon (or more innocent price reduction or anti-piracy as a counter-monopoly victory [3]), then it is destined to be clamped forever.
Now readers know why I have to emphasize the Chinese / historical / citizen teacher. Please agree with friends as a technical problem. Please bring this message to more people who care about social, and more useful than computer experts who bring only care technology.
Also called on the school to teach the computer, temporarily put the order / type / illustration / ... and other technical issues, you can ask yourself, our mobility students make beautiful documents, but do not tell him to respect others / abide by Law, should not send .DOC and other closed file formats, is this right? Is this a teacher? Computer teacher? Computer book authors? Professor of teachers' colleges?
I don't know, I can't understand it, and I haven't seen it. I haven't seen it! - Han Yu "said"
Desire to terminate the day technology
Back to technical issues, do not use .doc files, have there be alternative to alternatives? Different from everyone's needs, this issue has different answers,
The biggest influencing factors are not much mature than the external environment, but what is the desire of a person. If the reader finds that from a practical point of view, the old version of MS Office is enough (otherwise only if the old version of Office is alive?) The past upgrade is forced, it is meaningless, then no matter whether it is disabled .doc file, at least no blind upgrade. Old version of Office is a new version of Office. As for if the new version is received, the file cannot be opened, please transfer this article to the sender. Your harvest is no longer needed to spend money and do not need.
If you also found the small change of usage habits, the small 并 不 不 程序 程序 程序 程序 程序 程序 程序 程序 程序 方案 方案 方案 方案 方案 方案 方案 方案 程序 程序 程序 程序 程序 程序 方案 方案 方案 方案 方案 方案 方案 方案 方案 方案 方案 方案 方案 方案Because it uses the public file format, your file will no longer be kidnger: don't worry that it leaks personal privacy or official secrets [5], and even throw away work like British weapons experts in the proceeds of the documents. And even the life [6]; your file can be opened on different job platforms, can also be saved for a long time, after the year, it is still useful; poisoning is less than a big source. These are unable to enjoy users who insist on users who use MS Office. It's a little less, in exchange for a very big gain. If you further find the key points of the document processing / spreadsheet / newspaper, it is actually transmitting / saving information, not a beautiful view, then .html is a replacement of .DOC and.ppt; simple pure text form format. CSV is . xls alternative. The author wrote the needs of class chief / submission / speech, relying on. HTML format can be completely met, do not need any special text processing software or briefing software. But this does not mean that we cannot use these software. exactly the opposite. Our demand for file appearance is so low, so that almost any text processing software (of course, oo.o) can be edited by file and briefing, of course, network processing software such as NVU [7], etc., It can also be used. Even like the author, use VIM (similar notepad, but a powerful tool) and so on. If you just want to read, it is more simple. In addition to any of the above software, the browser can also open. Our documents are ready to prepare for the Internet; not only cross the job platform, but also across the application software, not in return. If you teach you HTML's teacher or book, you will talk about the concept of content and look separation processing (Separation Of Content From Presentation) [8], with a few types of typographic rules, control / produce print version, There are many versions of the non-barrier web version, PDA, ... and more, truly drive computer to do very much work, rather than being controlled by the mouse, using people to mechanize, repeat, and originally should be the computer. Believe me, this is not difficult; general books are not teaching, not because it is difficult or useless, but because of the business-oriented software culture makes the general book authors' vision becomes simple and unable to replace the long-term interests of scholars. .
Do not use .doc files, have there be alternative to alternatives? Do you have how big is your demand for instruments? There are no endless people, destined to live in Microsoft (or replaced another monopoly vendor) constantly updating the version of the dream, in addition to him, no one can save him. On the other hand, the smaller the demand, the greater the elasticity, the more alternatives available, and more importantly, the more intangible benefits are obtained. In particular, when the hardware and hardware in the future, the platform will be encouraging the platform to transition. Open space planes to work, is of course cool; open helicopters will also draw a wind; but have / maintain / operate space aircraft or helicopters, how much price does it take? Drive or riding car is not more simple and practical? Also allow your environment. I am very suitable for riding a bicycle, the walking hard locomot can't walk, ... what kind of life is called to enjoy? Maybe a religious home is more understandable than us.
There is not much needed; too much - Sheng Yan Master
Nothing is not a rich manufacturer of Microsoft. This is not a satirical and understanding this is very important to sustain the file for our future. In the past, there were too many people misunderstand that the anti-Microsoft criticized Microsoft is due to the unbalanced mentality. So we must once again emphasize: Microsoft is not a rich manufacturer, and everything to do, but it is only responsible for its investors - do its own money.
So? Put any listed company in Microsoft, you will do the same thing - if I am a directors of the company, I will also ask the engineer to do the same thing as the business - encourage many people to use the company invented Format, and then make money within the range permitted.
What is the current law allows big companies? In addition to the software copyright Software Copyright, you can have software patents Software Patent. Take a mobile phone to do a metaphor, if I have a software copyright of a special call function, and you take my product to patterly, I can tell you. Is it fair? But if I have not only software copyright, but the software patent, even if you don't like my mobile phone, just use the same concept independently, you can use this special feature call. I can also tell you! Is it crazy? Is it ridiculous? Don't doubt, this is what we now went to the devil. [9] I am not a legal expert, I can't describe the details, just a warning of the professor of law. [10] Manufacturers indirectly deprive the freedom of consumers by unreasonable legal, recently real life is about to begin: all digital camera memory general use methods (rigorously called archive system format file system format) is actually used The general computer hard disk, while Microsoft has a patent with this way. In the past, Microsoft has not been pursued; but recently it plans to pay the right money. [11] Everyone consumers, lasting these unreasonable - but completely legal - the right money will be transferred to who? If someone wants to flee Microsoft's control, buy or create a software, will Does the photo all transferred? Sorry, it violates its patents. Our dream uses information technology to establish a modern Babel Tower; but when compatible / communication / exchange / connection information becomes a legal sin, our destiny, abandoned the establishment of Babel because of the non-communication between the Bible The people of the tower are not far away - this time we can't blame God, can only blame our own.
But God confounded their tongue, so what Did NOT UNERSTAND One ANOTHER's Speech ... and. - "Tower Of Babel" Genesis 11: 1-9
Talking about it is to remind everyone: avoid using the.doc file, is it safe? Is there any problem with Adobe ?pdf? Is there any problem with Microsoft Word 2003? X 笔 笔 笔 格 格 格In-depth research, only knowing that there is a patent issue involved. Both companies do not take legal action for any user or other software manufacturers that provide related technologies, not because they have no rights, but because they are showing goodwill. However, some information We hope to keep saving, this type of information can be established on the basis of the manufacturer's kindness? Don't forget the manufacturer's first principal is not the right of consumers, but its interests. Before the legal experts have saved the law that has been extremely distorted,
We should adhere to the selection of public, not controlled by any company, no format that patent doubts.
Polysha into a tower drip stone wearing a reader, you can choose to continue to transfer / spread the closed format file. Doc / .xls / .ppt, choose ignore this article: "What is it? Rejected .DOC file is just an arm shock!" You can damage the monopoly, illegal copy, national image that is caused, safeguard the police for police, and the vision of the vision and economic disadvantages is not a result, ... and so on is the responsibility of others. The responsibility of the country is the responsibility of Microsoft, but "it is definitely not a district, my responsibility!"
Or, you can also choose not to ask for results, insist on doing week, good for social things. You can choose to implement Master or Pastor's minds into life (if you have religious beliefs). You can choose to believe that humanity and social atmosphere can be inflated, and we believe that we have the ability to change unreasonable social phenomenon. Just like spitting, manufacturing second-hand smoke, treat women with unequal laws and employment conditions, discrimination against mental disabilities, indifference to limb obstacles, unnecessarily manufacturing garbage, unnecessarily wasting water resources, electing tickets, elections. These things that are the mainstream of society in the past. But the past, the past, this chapter history tells us that it is obviously harmful to society, lacking legitimate support, not bad habits of justice, regardless of how it is deeply rooted, and finally resist the strength of social reform.
What can you do?
1. Stop send / spread the closed file format, such as .doc, .xls, .ppt, etc.;
2. Stop the tool book of the enclosed file format software (MS Office, etc.) to change the open file format software (OO.O and NVU, etc.). 3. When purchasing a computer, it is required that the manufacturer is pre-installed [12] legal, free, can make an open file format Office software oo.o or web-made software NVU.
4. Publish this concept or this article to teachers, charity, social athletes, ... and so on care about social atmosphere and justice, care about national image, and care about the disadvantile group.
Tell them this is not a technical issue, this is a public morality and social topic.
5. Choose a [I don't use .doc file] patterned on your webpage and point to this article. You don't need to completely clear the .doc files in your computer, you can also post these labels. As long as you provide the files downloaded by others on your site without .DOC, etc., you will welcome these labels.
6. Even if you have changed oo.o, even if OO.D can open the .doc file, etc., or continue to boycott these closed formats.
7. If you find that the website of government units at all levels, some important documents have only a new version of the .DOC file format, please send this article to the head of the unit, please don't shoot the patron and spend the taxpayer's money without upgrading. , Also forced people to buy or illegally copy the new Microsoft software. If necessary, you can copy to the administrative institute, please ask the Executive Institute to assess the agency or local government, and the next year's budget will be wasted, and the behavior of the public will not respect the behavior of the people. According to the side understanding, some of the relevant units of the administrative hospital have some contractors to support the concept of refused .DOC files, but in the strong rebound of local agencies, it is impossible to force requirements. At this time, the central administrative power is relatively weak, and public opinion is strong, they need our help. At this time, the county and the county MOU may be more gangs more than the legislator.
This article is "I don't have to .doc" [13] update; foreign countries also have many similar articles [14]. In recent years, there have been more and more newspapers and network articles to support such views. I am very grateful to friends who have participated in the pass / spread this idea in these years. A concept, as long as there is persuasive, it can cause resonance encountered by the reader's real life, and naturally will gradually pass. Software companies attempted to kidnap the public documents, perhaps invested high marketing funds, but when more and more people feel that the freedom of reading their own creation documents is deprived, the reproduction will be invalid. We believe in the gathering tower, water drops. Please join us, play a piece of sand, a drop of water, stop spreading .Doc / .xls / .ppt file, stop fueling monopoly and illegal copy, letting this world more good citizens!
Reference data 1. Hong Dui. "Maintaining the right of the connection information, consumers to seek Du Fu". 2001.
Http://www.cyut.edu.tw/~ckhung/a/c010.shtml
2. Herbal grass. "The people in the ancient books are distressed: sad and tiger."
http://www.geocities.com/changchao.geo/psibook010509.htm
3. Hong Dui. "Opium Opium War".
Http://www.cyut.edu.tw/~ckhung/a/c020.shtml
4. Wu Hongkai et al. "OpenOffice.org Supply Station".
http://ooo.tnc.edu.tw/
5. Mao Qingzhen. ".Doc file leak secret".
http://www.lins.fju.edu.tw/mao/Works/nodoc.htm
6. "Inquiry INTO DAVID KELLYS DEATH".
http://www.democracynow.org/Article.pl?sid=03/09/02/1413225
7. Lindows, Inc. "NVU - The Complete Web Authoring System for Linux".
http://www.nvu.com/ (in fact there is also a Windows version)
..
Http://www.cyut.edu.tw/~ckhung/a/c021.shtml
9. Pilch, Hartmut, et. Al. "FFII: Software Patents in Europe" .http://swpat.ffii.org/index.en.html
10. Moglen, Eben. "Patently Controversial". 2001.
Http://emoglen.law.columbia.edu/publications/lu-16.html
11. Public Patent Foundation. "Pubpat Challenges Microsoft Patent To Protect Competition in Software Markets"
http://www.pubpat.org/microsoft_517_reexam_filed.htm
12. Hong Chauui. "Information Consumption Proposition: Please sell it to the computer you can use!" 2003.
http://www.cyut.edu.tw/~ckhung/a/c034.shtml
13. Hong Chauui. "I don't use .DOC file".
http://www.cyut.edu.tw/~ckhung/a/c_91.shtml
14. Goldberg, Jeff. "MS-Word Is Not a Document Exchange Format".
http://www.goldmark.org/netrants/no-word/attach.html •
Browse this list; browse the last layer directory; this page latest version URL:
http://www.cyut.edu.tw/~ckhung/a/c041.shtml; you can see versions: 13-Oct-2004; • Author: Department of Information Management Hong Chaogui Chaoyang University of Technology • Baby you my Earth Please reduce printing, multi-purpose back, and do waste classification. • This document authorizes in Creative Commons Attribution-Noderivs license, welcome to copy / spread / reference (please indicate); please do not modify
