A connection on agile thinking & agile Declaration
http://blackwhite.blogdriver.com/blackwhite/330506.html
"Old programmer" BLOG.
Among them, some feelings about IPMP (play "love" love to shoot "), the same as my guess, although I just know what PMP from my colleagues, but I can think that it is not what I like and worth investing. s things.
Often there is a saying "Software Engineering Name from the construction industry", I think, always is the time to let the software engineering beyond the construction industry of the class, there is no agile thinking, the software will lose its lives themselves. Activity and artistic.
Teaching barism is something I especially hate and respect.
Reliverate the agile declaration:
Individuals and Interactions Over Processes and Tools. Working Software over Comprehensive Documentation. Customer Collaboration over Contract Negotiation. Responding to Change over Following a Plan.
People and interactions are more important than process and tools.
Software that can work is more important for full-blaming documents.
Customer cooperation is focusing on contract negotiations.
Change changes at any time, focusing on the rules.
Slowing online, discovered another article (agile software development: Feedback and innovation) Translated to Agile Declaration: 1. Personalization and interaction of processes and tools 2. Run software 3 under the perfect document command. Customer collaboration in the signing contract 4. Different from the reaction and the first translation below the planned command, the second translation is more conceivable, collaborative, and more inclusive and equilibrium. The first translation is more tendency, the flag is more distinct, and the values are more persistent. I personally follow the first kind of view, but from the actual departure, more agreement, in real work, compromise, balance is often more constructive than persistence, when two concepts can coexist and symbiosis When I think "6: 4 principles" will seem more to be more considers: both of the two considerations and certain principles and deflection. For example, I now tend to accomplish the work, 4 heavy-duty methods (such as ISO, CMM) to deal with the process - of course, in a certain amount of time, the distribution of effort and time is an art. Some detail phases, the use of 73 principles or 82 principles, no. But 10: 0 should be avoided as much as possible.
