Several issues of several constraints, relative to the maturity of software development theory, and the test theory is still very young. (Of course, compared with the theory of industrial development, software development theory is also very young.) The rise of the test industry will have a large part of the maturity of the test theory. There are still some problems that are not in conjunction now, and I have been thinking about the problem (maybe these problems have been solved, little lonely), the following will make these questions a summary, in order to expect Find a solution later. 1. Where is the end of the test? As an engineering process, the guidelines that cannot be clearly defined activities are like a vessel sailing in the sea, there is no very terrible thing. The test is such a boat without a target. The standard of the most suitable test end should be that the number of defects is controlled in one acceptable range. However, in the actual process, it is never known that the number of undisfred defects will never be found, although there will be a method to estimate the number of unknown defects, but the accuracy and the cost of the cost make it a high feasibility. So although this standard is most suitable, it is not practical. Another test end criterion is measured in the process. According to the test process, the corresponding steps have been completed, and the work is completed, even if the test is completed. This test end criteria and no guidelines have no nicknames, at all, did not meet the purpose of acceptance. In other words, this end criterion has a hypothesis that this assumption is that the defined test process is fully effective. In this case, this criterion can be used to end the test activity. So this guidelines are not very accurate, but the criterion of the most common test end. There is also a very common criterion, which is the timeline end criterion. When I arrived, no matter what, even if it ended. This guidelines will also often encounter some unregulated companies. Personally think that this criterion is the most harmful to the test. If you encounter the organization, the test quality can only be blessed by God. In summary, if it is possible to define a test end criterion that can be used as an objective evaluation criteria, it is relatively easy to implement, it will have a profound impact on the maturation of the test theory. 2. How to evaluate the priority of the tester as the subject of the test activity, the priority of the tester directly affects the advantages and disadvantages of the test activity. But how can I evaluate the quality of the tester? The level of the tester cannot be measured with the number of defects, so that the test can only be tested to discover the surface's defective activities. The number of documents that cannot be written is compared to measuring the level of testers. Unable to measure the level of testers with the number of defects to measure testers can see micro-knowledge; excellent testers have unique ways of thinking, can constantly innovate test methods; excellent testers can clearly describe the defects, and Convince developers to correct; excellent testers can obtain the biggest understanding of the system from the smallest information; excellent testers need flexible thinking, comprehensive knowledge. These are qualitative analysis, with great subjective factors in it, if there is a method, can hook these with the results, quantify, will have a great help to the management of human resources management. 3. How to reflect the value test of tests as a service department developed, can reflect your own value well, which will be an important factor in the future. It is difficult to reflect the value of tests. Here I explain one by one: 1. The results of the test are mostly intangible assets. It is difficult to measure. Product quality and corporate image This asset can be said to be the most direct result produced by test, but this asset will be difficult to measure. The second type of results that can be produced is to improve the ability to develop, and it also belongs to the result of difficult measuring. 2. The identified test results are easily ignored is the value of the test.
