Humans form a group in order to survive. Maintaining the survival of the entire population is the goal of the entire group, but it is not necessarily the goal of everyone in the group. The ideas between people are not the same (especially in the so-called 'interest'), they will have differences or even disputes. If the entire group will face the entire group, it will face the splitting or even break, and the target of the entire group of the survival of the entire population is completely departed. So human beings have long found the defects of their own perspectives, ideas, and interests, so humans invented '理'. This '理' 非 '天 理' rational Here '理', its meaning is a 'public awareness "that has been cultivated in the entire group of each group of survival' to the entire group of survival ', is a public guideline, its purpose It is in the group rather than individual.
This has a problem, who is the '理'?
As an individual, can it be exceeded personal consciousness, reaching the view of 'global', and draw a consciousness of groups that can be used throughout the group, but also need further adoption and discussion. But from the perspective of history, the examples of the '理 理' to clarify the number of examples since ancient times.
There is also a problem, who is this '理' who is maintained?
So, the arbitrator appeared. Arbitrator (Of course, it is not necessarily a person, or it is a small group or other one. What is the appearance of me is a 'inevitable', the necessary 'solution' necessary for human own defects. The duties of the arbitrator are not to maintain the '理' ', but based on' 理 'arbitration'.
However, 'arbitrator' is not 'ruler'. The reason is very simple, because the responsibility of the arbiter is not to maintain the '理' ', but based on' 理 'arbitration' '. In other words, it is to maintain (including formulation) '理' is not the matter that 'arbitrator' should do, the 'arbitrator' should do should only be ', based on' 理 'arbitration' '.
So who goes to maintain '理'?
It is a whole group that supports 'arbitrator'.
As a human group, there must be a (can be multiple?) Leaders (of course, not necessarily people, maybe a small group or other), I firmly believe in this, but still need further On the inspection. The so-called 'ruler' is the leader of the present group (can be more than the animal world, most of the rulers of the group are the most brave and strongest). The responsibility of 'rulers' is to lead the entire group and use force to achieve the purpose of making the survival and development of the entire population.
So 'ruler' is not in the column of arbitration, can you be a 'arbitrator' or even '理' settters?
It seems to have an example in history, and there are a lot.
To harvest, everyone must abide by his society ', and it is best to know what is observed. Everyone has to complete their duties. The so-called politics, but it is a thinking method created by human beings in order to survive.
