LWP1982: This problem seems to have discussed that the digital circuit is discussed. The simulation will be replaced, the result is, the simulation is still in the same way, and the monolay is to be replaced. Not implemented yet
The numbers are constantly evolving, and the simulation is the same.
21 Huaxue: Will not replace the simulation, in the audiovisual high-fidelity field. The number does not have an alternative to analog simulation, and the number itself is not ideal for full reproducibility. Simulation is the basis of electronics, and the number in full sense does not exist, and it can be said that the number is a small branch of electronics, because moderate is the foundation of the electrical, and the lowermost thing is impossible to be replaced.
DMCZ: My opinion is: I will first take an example: Americans have made an experiment, implanted in a blind eye into some light sensors and some processing, and the results of artificial eyes appear. I want to say that the world is simulated, but what simulation can quantify, "very numbers" can be used instead of simulation! Note that "very numbers", under the premise you can accept, such as your ears and eyes. In short, the high digitization, the simulation is replaced when approaching the simulation requirements.
LARKZER: No replacement of simulation will now simulate something that is first transformed into a number, and then restores the increasing modularity of the eDA's increasingly mature simulation of EDA. It means that the system may be the system. Level design is an analog engineer's outlet
Welcomezy: I am doing this topic here, because I am a newbie, now I am watching the simulation, but my friend is doing electronics, half a year, not bad, at least I think I can, now I can learn DSP, now He told me that a good person of simulation is particularly promising, but the average person does not have to learn too well, because it is more difficult to learn, and now make a lot of work numbers. This is his point of view, but I don't think so. , But after all, he is learning to simulate ... Listening to him, it is uncomfortable, in fact, in the discussion of everyone, the conclusion is already very clear - digital importance, simulation is more important, a good electronic engineer It must be part of the two! I don't want to discuss it in the future. Everyone is still learning, I hope that this post is so sinking ... I am looking at the micro-variable equivalent circuit method ...
Highway: The simulation is required, a wire, which will generate a pressure drop by a certain current, such as the wire power supply is too thin, the system may generate problems 2, such as PCB power and ground It is best to have the land / power plane, which is also analog problem 3. If the device has to pass EMC, huh, there is no simulation knowledge and experience? Know the knowledge of analog circuit, there will be improved your design.
LiWeiPingl: If you don't understand the simulation, you won't understand the numbers. If you don't understand the electronic, you won't understand the numbers, you can't learn electronics, even if you learn a little, you will not go to apply, equal to Bai Xue. Simulation is idea, numbers are means. "The" relatively complex cost of using the digital method ", the cost is high" I disagree, the digital applications are getting wider and wider, the cost is only lower and lower, the transistor has a number of wafers, and a integrated circuit may be more than one. The transistors are cheaper and less materials. Complex is relative, more cases have increased the complexity of the software, and 100% eliminated simulation of processing processes is certainly impossible, and the op amp is an simulation that is difficult to eliminate. Although it can also be partially replaced.
Nine paragraph: I don't understand the simulation, you can learn electronics! Technical development continues to disappear, direct A / D, and then all are digital processing. Therefore, in addition to the design of the chip level involves simulation, the future trend will inevitably be dominated by digital processing. It also includes the proportion of practitioners, most people can only know how digital processing can be made. This is no matter what we love our simulation technology. The previous post has said that digital processing technology is to replace the simulation process, it will work to 100%, but because the world is simulated, it is less than 100%. So the future electronics engineer has 1% of simulation knowledge. Or 1% of people are engaged in simulation design, and 99% are complete digital electronics engineers. Nine paragraphs: Digital technology is to replace simulation, only a percentage problem. Technology development will more and more replacements, but as Rivflood said, because the world is simulated, it is necessary to transform with information about the simulation of the world. However, different understanding of the simulation can result in different methods of digital processing. It is generally realized by simulated methods, the simple cost is low, and the use of digital methods is relatively complex and cost. The future development will display the level of chip design.
