What kind of economics, what kind of people are superb group - What kind of person is Beijinger? I don't know, but I am sure, I must be a male and female who knows economics. Haha, let's make a joke. This is an article seen in the southern windows. I don't know if there will be any infringement. Then I am unlucky!
I frankly, I thought that China's economists now defended and strive for freedom, closer to the first, and long-term, this freedom can neither guarantee that wealth can not bring peace. Here, I only give some of their extreme but very popular arguments. For example, with cost and benefits to measure corruption is a general view of economists. They think corruption is a small amount of advancement, and even think that it can be corrupted, or that corruption is because officials are too low. Therefore, they will go to corruption. If they meet their desires, they will be in the law; some people advocate that the country should bet, open, saying that it can be done to reduce management costs; whether you should pay for the courage, It is also necessary to calculate the difference between cost and revenue. The conclusion of a famous debate is that the behavior of seeing righteousness is just his "maximization of your own interests", and the morality and courage here are there without any status; extravagance is wasteful It should be encouraged, because of the promotion of consumption, even if the number of per capita doctors will have a poor country, there is already one of the world's largest health care products. These costs and revenue calculations are a fallen freedom. Its essence is to taught us to use the cost and benefit of calculations to disregard all laws and moral political meanings to meet the desire to get rich for what they want. It hurts the sacred freedom we should defend and strive.
What is this so-called economist under education? Lenovo's recent Hong Kong's disclosure of some small issues of some listed companies in the Chinese stock market. I always feel that I seem to understand what is called let a part of the development of people! Hey! This year, I should participate in the postgraduate study, I can not be admitted to the famous university, and I can do a white-collar. Or is it a common knowledge of people!
How can I be this?
When selfish, selfishness is exaggerated
If someone says, this is the only way to choose under real conditions, then I want to answer if it is just a corrupt to corrupt and joined the people to achieve excessive mandatory dissolution, this behavior It is despicable and timid, it can only get the consequences of freedom.
This is because in such a law, they will only pay attention to their own interests. They will only huddle in narrow personalism. Public welfare products are completely suffocated, and public life is impossible. People are confined in a private life, there is no common feelings, only common fashion, just like Marx's France, becoming a "potato type" country. They do not have maintenance of their own interests and rights, which is the maintenance of universal benefits and rights, because they love interests and rights, just because it brings themselves because it brings dignity and freedom, they can't share others. Emotion, everyone's costs and benefits are completely different, is unscrupulous, so every right is a privilege for them, and every right will get the distance from him and others. Instead of making people closer.
People living in this kind of law, only for money, each person is only desperately earned, because the amount of money is the most clear sign of measuring the size of the income. They strictly follow the principle of personal interests, so that they will never waste their valuable time in work without income, but they have forgotten the most important thing, that is, they should first be their own owners. . When capitalism has raised, it is an appreciation of the intension, but the capitalist who accumulates wealth is not to enjoy the music, but think that this is the way to get close to God; in the United States, people, people Take freedom as the biggest guarantee for a happy life, although they are hobbies, but never think that the official work is extraordinary. In the 1980s, people used to earn their honors and praise, and thought that this is the performance of their ability, and now, the cold money becomes a happy source, and freedom is to enjoy, it is the reward for himself. That is, the maximization of personal interests is achieved. Within a certain boundary, accounting for cost and revenue is completely legitimate and indispensable, such as company management, corporate system, etc. However, in the public domain, if costs and benefits become unique to high rules and measures all standards, it is not a good thing, especially if this is the purpose of freedom. Because a free person must first be a person with ability to be authorized, it is a person who can do his own owner, how to learn and maintain autonomous ability, how to cultivate such a civic spirit, is to maintain the "fair and kindness "Freedom of the Method.
Overall, education from economists has weakened the people from two aspects: On the one hand, the concept of "everyone who is full" is used to make people look up each other, and only focus on their own personal affairs. Since they are all interested in making a fortune, they will no longer pay close to their personal happiness with all the prosperity. On the one hand, the cost of using unlimited promotion is used to make the people weak and sluggish. Through this, the people who weakened are equal to the unstead of armed, they lost their ideas to participate in public affairs and their own hands, they will never learn the ability of autonomy and the pride of autonomous, they will not make their own habits. With the form of organizational form and the necessary combination, it will not have a common feeling of "the" the nature and the scope of the nature and the scope of rights "of its own obligation. Lack of these emotions, long time, putting them on this land of the blood of this land, because we know, the patriotic heart is a kind of feelings that are cultivated by the hometown through practice, and there is no love for hometown. There is no patriotic heart. They are like a group of fellows who have eaten with craftsmanship, where there is a personal interest, where is the personal interest.
It is particularly serious that this "people's self-interest" is forcibly grafting with the principle of "people's sovereignty". We know that "the principle of the people's sovereignty is" legal law "in modern democratic society, and it is a basis for all laws. In the eyes of economists, the principles of the people's sovereignty are the concept of people who have fulfilled people. As long as everyone struggles with their own interests, the natural game between the interests will produce freedom, and see some more dogmators. Come, this road is the only correct road to freedom and wealth. However, in the most powerful and most successful practices of the United States, the implementation of the people's sovereignty is another look, where, the people manage themselves, and manage themselves. All the powers are all owned by society, and almost no one dares to generate the idea of finding power, not to say dare to make such an idea. "People" and "people" that can be self-managed and only know "people" that protect their own interests may not be the same "rational". They are the products of different countries, or in turn, they can achieve the same country. Maybe someone will refute that a country is only a problem that is rich to talk about freedom, so China should now work on wealthy purposes, and freedom is the next thing. Such an excuse cannot be satisfied, it looks rich and freedom as a natural causal relationship, we don't lift those countries in the Arab world, as well as the example of Nazi Germany, not to say in ancient world Those who have established a free system due to poverty, as long as we look at the problems in China's reforms, it will understand the key to the problem is not the first freedom or wealthy, but what kind of freedom and what is rich. In the history of human history, people have once because of "blood flowing into the river in love", because of the "natural game", because the freedom of self-interest is unable to reach a compromise, the blood flow into the river example is not more? The final result is that wealth and freedom are not available.
What kind of country is still what kind of country creates?
Who can answer such a problem, who should answer such a problem?
All in all, this is my little bit. Most still is the point of view of Copy. Occasionally, a little doubts and depressed, I think everyone is difficult to avoid in their own life!
