My opinion: White took your book, I wanted to write a sense of reading, I can read the book, I feel a bit not particularly good. Think about it, it is estimated that it is much more common praise and criticism. So I am still actually actually, in some places in some of the books in the book and feel less smooth, I hope to give you some more real help. Novice opinion, a lot of fallacy, if there is no respect, I hope to forgive.
First, some of the places I feel uncomfortable
P2 countdown 5th line, investigate "Mom"
P7 countdown line 2, "Development of the project" seems unnecessary.
P12 countdown 6-7, "even ... realize this". Although this is reality, but from the perspective of business morally criticism, such a proposed method is not appropriate, it may cause readers to have an insecurity for the author's integrity, which is not conducive to the author to establish a good public image.
P19 Additional Instructions "In the user's category ... Friends relatives, etc." seem to have a concept of enlargement. And there is still a problem of the above moral criticism. Moreover, this "relational" thinking of the first part of the book appears, and the pure technical book name is not coordinated. If necessary, you can open the feature paragraph to do the side. Try not to push the technical book positioning of the book.
P23 countdown chapter 7, "To avoid rejection requirements is reasonable"
P26 5th line, "can only"
P27 24th line, rule "broad"
P32 2nd line, Rose's appearance is too serious. There is no front image, and immediately appears in a common problem.
P45 2nd line, welcome "and" everyone criticism
P49 1st line, "Main and most important" = most important
P50 line 2, "Please refer to" Business ... "", where is the sub? RUP2002?
P53 10th line, P56 countdown 11 line, "For example: use case with email ...", it is also bullied in the stone.
P54 countdown 8th line, "lessons and experience", generally "experience and lessons"
P54 countdown Chain 6, "Fourth level", the introduction of grading is still behind.
P55 paragraph 3, two words are ignive.
P59 begins to see the actual engineering map, it is not as good as those Toy examples. But after all, it is from practice, can't be two full :)
P71 Chain 1, "Recycling Example ..." Where is this example?
P108 countdown 13th line, two "old" project
P109 1st line, "... After ...,", it seems to be a confused
P109 4th line, the same "learning"
P109 8th line, "some" suggestions, these two words seem to be
P109 countdown line 3, "National Provincial Telecom Company"?
P110 10th line, software demand "further. "" It seems to be "made"
P110 12th line, two "old" famous characters
P111 Chapter 4, P113 Chapter 4, UML language is not appropriate to the first two methods
The content of B in P130 does not understand
P136 5th line, "Class ... can only be a passive"
P137 diagram, abnormal behavior is not clearly marked
P139 Last 1 line, talk less politics.
P149 Figure 2nd note, "Here the author ... naming" more written
P151 Figure 5th line, "generd"
P154 1 line, "and attributes" did not delete
P154 5th line, "additional"?
P163 Unconventional step, Ctrlc, Ctrlv, too detailed?
P173 Chapter 6, "Don't"
P177 Figure 3.5 and P178 Figure 3.6 seems to
P193 countdown 2nd, "As for ... don't say", this sentence does not seem to be large P205 1st line, "P"
P205 Third line, "These ... very perfect", different sentences
P254 8th line, like "department"
P261 Chapter 9, Borlander? Rationaler?
P263 8th line, all "should" good
P272 countdown 12 line, a big "make"
Second, about the comment.
The approach dispersed in full text is in the way, especially some key concepts, can not be explained. I suggest that the "UML essence" method can be integrated with the form of the special paragraph.
Some comments seem to be unnecessary. For example, IEEE introduction.
Some annotations for further explanation can be placed in the text.
There is also an annotation, generally a classic interpretation, and it is not advisable to discharge individuals.
Third, regarding the "Book Friends Tips", mainly the author's personal feelings. But "friendship" in this name looks at some blame, but also can't say why, it is some blame :)
Fourth, the full text of the development example has the basic front and rear coherence, but there is no obvious comprehensive background introduction. It is easy to see examples, and the background is understood.
5. A large number of books in the book "This part of the content will be described in detail in X-section", "there is a taste of goto, and it is uncomfortable.
2004
year
8
month
twenty four
day
Tuesday
Baby reply:
Bamboo horse, hello!
thank you very much for your suggestion. I will post your suggestion to my blog, and I will be issued on the 9CBS forum so that all people can notice these issues. Since I have recently been busy with other affairs, I have never been able to pick all the mistakes in the book, list the wrong list, here I spend my heart!
======= 2004-08-26 19:37:48 Write in the letter: =======
> qingrun, hello! >> Originally, it is born, not wanting to write a sense of reading> After reading the book> I think something to write some things to get the book you sent> So the following opinions> See attachment >>>> courtes! >> Bamboo Horse> ******** @ sina.com> 2004-08-26
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Rift! Qingrun@163.net 2004-08-26
