Concept, judgment, reasoning is the basic form of thinking. It is determined by the concept, and reasoning is composed of judgment, so the concept is the cells of thinking, which is the basis for our thinking. Logic requirements We strive to be clear, judging properly, and is logical in the process of thinking. Thus, if there is a problem in concept, the wrong judgment and reasoning will be made. The concept has two important logical features, that is, any concept has connotation and extension. Connotation is the unique attribute or essential property of the object reflected by the concept. Extension is a type of object reflected in the concept. These objects have the concept of concepts reflected by the concept; concepts have different types, and there is different concepts. Relationship; concept is through words, concepts and words have both close relationships, and the difference between essential. Logic provides basic knowledge about the concept is the necessary conditions for our correct application concept. The sophistication of the ulsender in concept is mainly: playing words game, using ambiguous word, homophobia confusion concept; connotation and extension of deliberately speaking concept, and the flexibility of subjective application concept, and so on. Example analysis, what do you want to learn, a young man in the Thousands of Mountains, come to a small island in the Triangle Sea area of the Atlantic Ocean, a philosopher who is hidden there, is to learn about the knowledge of the Dao. After seeing this philosopher, the youth explained. Unexpectedly, the philosopher is a sophthister. There are a few words to make the youth make paste. Philosopher: Are you want to learn knowledge? Youth: Yes. Philosopher: What you already know is what you want to learn? Youth: No, I don't want to learn something you already know. Philosopher: So, do you want to learn something you don't know? Youth: Yes, I want to learn what I don't know. Philosopher: If you don't know if you have a horse at all, can you think of learning about horse's knowledge? Youth: No, I can't want to learn about the knowledge of the horse, because I don't know if there is a horse. However, philosophers, I know that there is a horse, there is really a horse in the world. Philosopher: Slow, I ask you, what do you answer me, don't go to other places. Let me ask you: If you don't know if there is a mysterious island in the Bermuda Triangle waters, can you think of learning about this island? Youth: Will you want to learn about the knowledge of the island that I don't know at all. Philosopher: "Alien Artificial Asterm" launched in the solar star, you of course don't know. Can you think of learning about this asteroid? Youth: No, it is impossible to learn about it. Philosopher: So, what you don't know, isn't what you want to learn? Youth: Yes. Philosopher: You just said, what you already know, is not something you want to learn; now you say, what you don't know, it's not something you want to learn; and things are nothing more than you already know. Things, or something you still don't know; so, there is nothing, you want to learn. Youth: Is this this? ! Philosopher: If there is nothing, what do you want to learn, then, what are you coming here? After the sophistication of the philosopher, this youth seems to be unclear what he came to do. This philosopher is worthy of a magician that steals the concept. So, what is the "Magic" to lure a young man who wants to know about it without oneself Let us be drawn.
The three answers made from the beginning of the philosopher, you can see that the issues they originally discussed are: Do you want to learn the knowledge about what you have existed? This problem actually contains two small problems: 1 You know something that exists, and you have mastered the knowledge about this matter, do you still want to learn? 2 You know something that something, but you have not mastered knowledge about this matter, do you want to learn? For the previous question, the answer is negative, and the next question, the answer is certain. In this dialogue, the term "something" used by the two is the concept of "knowledge". I don't know another question in the form of three hypotheses: Do you want to learn about what you have existed? This steals the problem of the original discussion. Young people have done a negative answer for this issue. So the philosopher asked: "So, what you don't know, isn't what you want to learn?" This is stealing the concept. Originally "things" in front of the concept of "knowledge", here, philosophers steal it into the concept of "things". The youth did not see this, he was smashed by the three questioned questions, and the result was a sure answer. Then, the philosopher in the form of "things" in the form of "knowledge" and "things" two different concepts, forcing youth to have to violate the original intention to accept him "Nothing is what you want to learn." "in conclusion. This youth is so fainted by philosophers, and I don't understand why. Candet judgment in the application is in a positive or negative thinking of things. The fundamental difference between judgment and concept is that it has obvious concise, that is, the relationship between the nature, things between things, the value of things, and the determination of people's behavior specifications. If the situation made in conformity or is conducive to achieving people's practical purposes, it is true or correct; otherwise, it is false or wrong. It is judged that there is a right problem in addition to having true and false, wrongness. A judged, although the local situation of things is correctly reflected, but the overall, overall, whole process of things, with a piece of film, such judgment despite the true, correct, but not appropriate. The so-called appropriate judgment is to comprehensively accurately reflect the judgment of the situation. Logic requirements We make judgments should be true, correct and appropriate. Testing a unique criterion for judging is social practice. The judgment and statement have a close contact, and it is determined that the ideological content of the statement is the language expression form of judgment. Any judgment must be expressed by the statement. Different statements can express the same judgment (synonym), and the same statement can express different judgment (ambiguzzles). In order to accurately express our idea, we have made judgments must have clearness. To do this, you should choose the accurate statement to express the ambiguity and ambigulence of the stance. The sophistication of the ulsender in judging the application is mainly: deliberately distorting a judgment of the original meaning; or gives different problems, different judgment is a talk; or deliberately use ambiguous sentence to express it according to your subjective needs The judgment makes an arbitrary explanation; and resort to power, strong words; reverse sequence; error story, etc. Example analysis "No mouth is not good" and "There is nothing in the eyes", there is a folk story called "smart mouth and media", saying that a photo is depends on spells. A girl is a lot of mouth because it is missing, can't marry it; a young man can't get a daughter in a daughter because there is no nose. But both parties have proposed a condition: do not have disabilities. Clerk media actually said this. She said to the man: "This girl does not have other problems, it is not good.
