At this point, many game development are internal development. I think this is the only purpose of this. It can only play a very good advertising effect after the development is successful, and gives the market a heavy bomb, which can play a very good advertising effect, in line with people's curiosity So it will not be able to play one, so it is a panic for a time, if this game is flat, but there is no very anesthes, maybe you can keep some habits. Players. If you want to develop in the market, I want to have three basic reasons: First. It is always incorporated into fresh blood, constantly innovation. [But you can't get away from the theme and principles of the game itself]. II. Combination with market propaganda [now many products What are you doing on-site activities, why can't the game? But now, I haven't found this in the country. I haven't found this]. II. Players' opinions and suggestions are very important. [Can not engage in privileges, take care of a few players as the basic principle What is internal development or if there is no innovation, if there is no innovation, I feel that there is no use. Or imitating too much like I don't dare to open source. To make a good game, experience is indispensable The idea is the most valuable. Summarize the advantages of internal development: 1. Keep the original code, facilitate the original development team to modify, basically there will not be any copyright battle. 2. When development is completed, it can give the market a good Advertising promotion effect. 3. Can guarantee a certain economic interest. Diffis between internal development: 1. After the development of the source, modify the source code to improve. But, when you need to modify something, there will be "chain reflection", causing Expected overhead. 2. Most programmers like to repair instructions, but don't like anti-workers, rewrite the code. This is undoubtedly one overhead. 3. Even if you need to modify the source program, if you can guarantee the original development team What? If not, then the problem may be more. Open source is a very good thing, why? I understand: You can bring money to your company or team: For example, This will not only accumulate quite abundant, I don't think light in a short period of time, but also is important. Time is limited, maybe this is a wonderful one in China's online game history. Page. Open source advantages: 1. Develop a maximum experience value for the development team in the shortest time. And shorten the development cycle. 2. Play an important role in the development of the software related industries. It can be said to be promoted .3. Closely combined with the market and players will make the game more perfect. 4. Or here, China's game industry is just beginning, because this can guide players, so that the game industry and players are healthy and benign. Disadvantages of open source: 1. It may therefore lose a small part of the economic interest. If I have a size, experienced development team, I am very confident, and there is enough development potential, then I can choose not to open source. If I am a development team that is developing, it's not a big development team, but there is a team spirit. And the fund is still still a long period of time, there is an urgent hope team to grow rapidly, then I choose open source, if I just want to develop, but if there is any personal or small collective, I will always pay attention to open source projects, Because this will benefit not to be shallow. Whether it is from the whole or an individual problem, it will be like this. If I think this, China's software industry will grow rapidly in the speed of multiplexing. About semi-open source: Individual thinks, I think this The possibility of the future is high, namely: the internal construction method and important link belong to confidentiality, but when the development is developed, it is closely combined with the market and consumer group. If this is the case, it may have a strong strong. Not only have technology, but also has a framework, but the small company has only framework, no technology. It may be like this. This is just one aspect, and some of the social nature of people. It has determined this result. If you can do the true open source, then the development speed will not be expected. Ps: The above is personal, because I am just an ordinary player. I think of these will write down. [If reproduced, please indicate it. ] CRSUN 2004.12.20 PM
