It has been used for a new standard with Web, and one or two works have been applied accordingly, and all new standards will be adopted in this revision of their homepage, but due to time issues, development progress is only carried out. About one-fifth, it seems that it can't finish it.
I went to XHTML2's document a few days ago, um, I feel good, especially for multimedia labels, unified "Object", then declare multimedia type, this feels like this kind of standard reference line, after various browsers Will no longer have some private labels such as Embed.
I am a new recommendator of web standards, but also the implementor, but I am not a fanatic fever of the new standard theory. I am very clear, then the new standard is so good, what is the conflict with our project? In fact, these conflicts do not come from our design, but from the customer's requirements, take this now.
The customer's request has the following:
1, more dynamic. In fact, the dynamic and standards are not related, but the dynamics of the customer understands the dynamic and us, they are only the elements of the page can "sports", flash or run, and everyone knows, there are many special effects, in fact, there are many It is some special effect code that IE private, does not support on other browsers, and more don't pay for DOM. In addition, use these effects. When the user is browsing this page, a large amount of resources of the CPU will be occupied, then it is a big discount on the website affinity.
2, to be completed within half a month. Many times, usually in the company's project size and time is basically proportional, this project is long, and its size is great. This project, this project, the size of the size is a lot of a lot, at least three weeks, and even a month. But the customer doesn't understand, they know: We need this website now, then I have to have now, I can't drag. Then, a project size and a project that is not met, if you use standards? Time is not allowed, then do not do high quality things, and relatively, it is convenient to use traditional design methods. For example, I can design the renderings in Photoshop first, then slice, and then write to the background code, save the headed time of this head.
3. The customer begins to see the effect. Like this project, there is no such request, but the deputy mayor later, it is asking for the design three style, supplying the mayor for choice, I am dizzy! According to the idea of new standards, this problem is handed over to Div CSS, but for this project, the other is not as good, the second is not in line with the actual situation. If you have no longer say it, you don't have to say it. It's not allowed to say that it is not in line with the actual situation because the customer requires a large number of picture combination design, which requires a vibrant artistic design, which is a lot of mares relative to image (although Table Image does not meet new standards, especially XHTML1.1 and higher).
4, artificial viewing angle. In fact, this application cannot be counted, because everyone's aesthetics is different, and the aesthetic standards and aesthetic rating are different. Everyone is seeing the face, and now the problem is coming, the customer is according to yourself. Requirements, we can do it, now add a superior leader (not directly related to the website, but it is very important), the contradiction is coming: the project is delivered to the customer, they are satisfied It is OK, but if you are finished with them, those leaders who come back to the previous level are dissatisfied, and they must have come back to rework and revise. Then the complexity is coming again, and the general project will be modified, and they have to count. This is different. Due to the particularity of leadership, this practice is cut off ... -_- # above, just in this project, conflict is more obvious, in the implementation of each project, There will be a corresponding contradiction, some contradictions are solved by the law, but some, only like -_- # like this, who makes our domestic website design atmosphere. We tried to change, but it is impossible to change at a large scale, of course, I didn't give up. Wait for my homepage
After this version of http://www.3rgb.com, go to orthodox to learn XHTML2, I like new and good things.
I don't know what related issues in their respective projects, welcome to exchange.
