I have seen a one-made a message in the morning. "
Behind the art is discipline - interview India Niit CEO has a sense of "telling the truth, the individual's point of view of Mengyan is not very good, it is a bit meant to come back the Royal and Zhou Xingxing of the comments - though The speech of the Zhou Xingxin brother is a bit funny.
Royal's point of view is close to the view of the "Software Blue Collar" that is considered to solve the problem "above" (ie management), "below" (ie, developer) is not a problem. I don't agree with this view. Software development is a creative job. In this regard, the construction of buildings cannot be completely equivalent (generally considered closer to the design process of the building). At this point, the views of our stars are not reasonable, namely: India's underlying developers are universal, so they are more suitable for this model.
However, Royal believes that when we complain to great buildings, please don't shirk your responsibility to "migrant workers". "He is in" human management and ancient Chinese ancient history: programmer Yu " The view is similar.
Zhou Xingxing said the ant colony system, which is indeed more close to the situation in India, and it is also very meaningful. However, Zhou Xingxing believes that Indian development staff is poor, but I think the level of domestic developers is also uneven, or "the quality of education products is very discrete". From a certain point of view, it is not as good as the "education product consistency". " Although our average may be higher than they. In such a talent market, large materials are small or small materials are inevitable, and although there is a lot of domestic developers, although there is a lot of India, they can not deny that there are some differences that are actually poor. In thinking, these will cause more adverse effects.
However, there are always the ideas: Royal believes that the problem is "above", because our "above" is not as good as Indians; while Zhou Xingxing believes that the problem is "below", Because those "below" are strong than Indians, they cannot be managed according to India. If the fox said:
This thing is actually a little philosophical taste. Just like xxism, some people say that some people say that good, in fact, it can be implemented. Some things are explore, no one is absolute. Who is wrong.
In short, there is different national conditions, and the road of India is not working.
The routine is not working. How to get yourself to explore yourself. Now our XXism has slowly moved in the exploration, and this software mode is getting late. In short, it is sure to "stick to Chinese characteristics". Grandpa Deng said that, touched the stone over the river, I can change it, get some cities (enterprises?) Pilot.
In fact, this idea should have many software companies, but this is easy to get out of the kick, the problem is those who engaged in pilot. Every one of your heads has your own set, try to tell the chaos.
Oh, this problem involves it, it is not the problem of software industry. However, the change is not the focus, and the focus is the change system. This issue involving the rule of law of the rule of law. If the system is a person specified instead of the company, it has a problem.
The rule of law is the king. 8 After the environment in China, the rule of law has a rule of law. The problem now is that even the people are not good. So I wrote "Software and Ancient History: Big Historical View", that is, I want to discuss how to get a good path in the current environment. Personally think that since we can't change such a human environment, it will only be succumbed. This may be a way that is more suitable for our own software development.
The "famous saying" that is often referenced on a MOP is always ended: life is like rape, if it is weak, it will close your eyes.
