I have been working in a domestic communication company to work. Although the time is not long, it also deeply feels the importance of the enterprise management system. Just as someone evaluated Chinese history, he used tyranny to shaping mobs, and the mob has gave birth to tyrannic to summarize the root cause of nationality. The company's system is also the same. Taking the company as an example, assume that the same two people, A, b into the company, of course, the task is impossible, a characteristics do things serious, careful, reflecting the program bugs, B, the characteristics of B. Quick development software (completed task), but because of this, the bug single is more; if you know the specific situation here, you will certainly think that A is better than B; but under the company's existing management level, things Not like this, the leaders feel that A mill workers, low work efficiency, slow speed than B. Second, leaders will think that A is difficult (after all, the actual leaders can't know the workload of each module), so bug less; In practice, unconsciously, the situation is backward, and finally A must not leave due to respect and treatment, or to learn its development method to b, it has been obtained! In actual work, I personally think this is a very real problem, and this is also the reason why our work is always looking for bugs, reforming bugs, introducing new bugs, and reasons for the week. Because of this, the final result is that our product is not good, this should be the fact that our products should be unexpected. Why do you like this, because we haven't made things in the beginning; if you want to do it? It is because we lack the external environment for a good job, and the correct management incentive mechanism. This is also the case where the management level is low, most domestic IT companies are common. From the perspective of the company's management mechanism, you can get the conclusions recognized by most people. However, in other words, do you have any other way out in addition to leaving and learn from B? Ibuo Zhang Yang is a deep theme of women's pursuit of freedom, achieving self-value, so Nara as a small woman who eats food, resolutely leave home. Of course, Nara is not able to solve fundamental problems, Lu Xun has written famous "Nara out after", and the conclusion is that she is either fallen or returned. In the current environment, if A is leaving, a big probability will enter a very similar environment in the company, what should I do, continue to leave? This doesn't fall into the strange circle of tyranny and mob? In the current environment, it is a very common phenomenon of inferior coins. However, in order to see a point of view, the individual's grades and abilities must be the definiteness of the leadership in formal organization to count? Every line of code you wrote, each message and each document are the embodiment of your ability, and it is your Credit. It is not only the external world that is the power of improvement, this is an interactive thing in the inside and outside. Even in the environment that is not conducive to your own, you should also work hard, and finally even if you don't get the level of identity in this environment, it is easy to change your ability to improve your own environment. This involves the evaluation system, the evaluation system should not only contain the outside world to your evaluation, self-positioning is also a very important aspect. The ancient sages are lonely. Many great people have been relatively low before they are not famous, even if they are engaged in technology, Gates and Paul. Allen is returned.
