"9CBS Development Master" was created from September 2003, and issued a 16 issue in December 2004, and I have been published as a technical editor of "9CBS development masters", participated in the editing of 14 issues. Unconsciously, this magazine has given an emotion, but it is still only the end of a hint of regret. Looking back in the editorial work of more than a year, I think the magazine has many shortcomings, but the quality of the magazine itself should not be said, maybe "pure technology" magazine positioning, not suitable for China's national conditions. "Development Master" is not a publication of the country, no country's support, only by the market, but under the impact of the Internet, the role of magazines is constantly cut, which is an objective fact. The reader group is not big enough, and it is also one of the problems. We constantly hear the reflection of the article that the article does not understand. In fact, most domestic software developers are only at the level of application of existing technologies, although the number of software development enthusiasts and college students is large, but the general foundation is not good, especially It is university, a large number of college computer education and real software development actual severity. Articles written by a first-line developer often refer to the problems encountered in practice, and readers who don't have this kind of practice are naturally unknown. Readers who can understand often prefer to access technical information on the Internet, this is a very helpless choice. In order to allow magazines to survive, we have made various efforts to adjust the magazine content. In response to the habit of first-line developers, we decided to transfer the reader group from the technical developer to the campus. So starting from the 9th issue of 2004, "developing a master" has been revised, and it is more important to pay more attention to students in the university campus. I didn't expect the revision scheme after publishing on 9CBS, a sound, strongly opposed the technical level of the article. In fact, it is very good to understand that people from 9CBS are probably the programmer, many of them are "technical first". I also have some development experience, objectively, the "development master" after the revision is only an additional entry level article, and there is still a difficulty of truly technical articles. Especially in the "soft" of "special planning", it is more intense to oppose the sound. In fact, the entire magazine 128 pages, "special planning" generally accounts for less than 10 sheets. :( At present, the technical magazine of pure development is not "9CBS development masters", the earlier "program spring and autumn", the "software development", the result is the same. Is it the current Chinese Journal Market Is it possible to allow a relatively high-end technical magazine to survive?
