Regarding the issue of the management of dominant knowledge, I believe that the library is essentially a social institution in which dominant knowledge management, the literature included in the library is clearly in line with Popper's definition of objective knowledge (individuals think so-called dominant Knowledge and objective knowledge refers to the east that can be exchanged through text or other symbols, and the potential knowledge and subjective knowledge are also the concept of equivalent. All activities we manage are objective. Knowledge management. It only needs to use significant knowledge this concept instead of the "literature" concept in the original narrative. This can be too arbitrary. But this is the basis of my understanding of libraries.
When referring to the core content of library studies, many basic theories are said to be a research on knowledge management. I have a good idea for this issue. I have a good idea too empty. Understanding is not deep, I don't dare to look.
The focus of the work and research of book intelligence person should of course be knowledge and research. The evolution process of focus is temporarily summarized as books -> Documents -> knowledge, and the knowledge here is obvious to refer to sexual knowledge, to be a library to undertake the entire society The responsibility of the knowledge and potential knowledge management education inheritance, this burden seems to be too heavy. It is very unreal, there is always a suspicion of self-prize. It is more important to seek truth from facts on the social functions of the library. What is the management of side redemption knowledge??
There is not an opposite relationship between dominant knowledge and potential knowledge. The conversion between the two is the meaning of knowledge management. From the historical development, the value of the library is to make humanity through the collection of dominant knowledge The wisdom civilization has been continued and developed. As a unique social institution, the library has its own organizational structure, must properly manage resources such as humanities and wealth equipment, open work objects - literature resources -, stealing With the management of potential knowledge, people-oriented.
