The story of a porridge reading today is that there are seven people living together, and a large barrel of porridge is divided every day. If you want to live, porridge is not enough every day. At first, they grabbed them to share the porridge, one round every day. So every week, they only have a full day, that is, the day of the porridge. Later, they began to pursue a moral noble person. The power will produce corruption, everyone began to dig empty thoughts to please him, bribe him, and get the whole small group black smoking. Then everyone began to make a three-person climber committee and the four selection committees, but they often attack each other, pull themselves, porridge is full of cold. Finally, I think about a way: turn the porridge, but the people who share the porridge will wait for some other people to take the last bowl. In order not to make yourself to eat, each person is trying to divide the average, even if it is not flat, it can only recognize it. Everyone is happy, and and gas, the day is getting better.
Also seven people, different allocation systems, there will be different atmospheres. Therefore, if there is a bad work habits, it must be a mechanism problem. It must be unfair fair and fair and fair, there is no strict prize. How to develop such a system is a question that needs to be considered for each leader.
In fact, the center is now in this way. Due to the assignment of the task and the processing of various problems, there are many problems, and no one can distribute the task very fair, and make the corresponding person get a corresponding return, regardless of How much is he is unselfish and how strong, some problems have never been avoided. So a team can't have order to survive, there is no good leader to manage and solve problems, not, just like the above story, a leader is leading everyone to make such a system, there must be strict prize Penalty is lazy, and the fair fairness of fairness is performed on the implementation. In this way, whether leadership or employees do not escape the chance of responsibility, there will be no mutual complaints and battles. Leaders can also easily implement the corresponding official, such a team of wind, it is true, it is true that the different allocation systems mentioned above will bring good atmosphere to bring new vitality.
The key question is whether such a good rules of regulating system can be made very prominently. I hope that the center can develop a regulatory for yourself, everyone is working under the system, maybe the wind will become better, and the efficiency will improve. The center will show a new look!
