First declare: I am absolutely not authoritative. No matter what I think, you agree, you can discuss, absolutely oppose attacks. I often see many people asking some of the questions that beginners should see, and there are many masters to tell them "Thinking in Java" book, or "Core Java 2" book. But most of the masters believe that "Thinking in Java" is not suitable for beginners, so I simply talk about my opinion. In fact, I am not suitable for beginners. First, beginners must be unfamiliar with Java, even C has not learned, without any object-oriented ideas. These two books are written by foreigners. The quality of translation has already placed the original arts, plus problems with understanding, beginners can figure out less content, and will raise Java difficult to learn. In fact, these two books are different, "Thinking in Java" is based on the research on Java in-depth content, exploring the problem of every detail, indeed, but I think the example of the book is an unforgivable. Failure. I really can't see any example that can have help, these examples are just examples of this problem. I want to spend more than looking for a long time to understand what is going on. The foaming agent is a subclass of cleaner, I rely, the object is really ubiquitous? The author has admitted that these examples are not a good example, saying, I am willing to take criticism to the toy example. I really don't understand, why not change it. : ("Core Java 2" only three chapters talking objects, and it is very deep. I know that many things I didn't know. Of course, there is no "thinking in java" in-depth. Just I don't know what extent, need Need to open the virtual machine? "Core Java 2" is very good, very real, very easy to understand. These two books are really good, but it is really not a beginner, and the beginners are looking into a start. Take a look, no problem. Waiting until Java has a certain understanding, then look at these two books, or only look at it enough ?? Personal point of view, please correct it.
