Crash due to needs - open system began to shake
Author: ZDNet ChinaCNETNews.com.cn
2004-11-22 08:32 AM
CNET Technology Information November 22 Review: Users are a set of programs, and you are an open system or non-open system. This phenomenon makes an open system to the user, it is meaningless. The industry can't help but ask, from the beginning of the 1990s, the open system that was praised, and all the ecological chains it established will collapse due to the needs of users. Look at the closed-and-set-in growth example, the manufacturer that bundles the database application system, and even hardware, has grown in the past few years, and a lot of growth. The IBM mainframe bundled the database middleware, and the software became the life-saving straw, Oracle closed together with the database and application software, but also to acquire the waves of various application management software vendors. This 10-year turnover has risen by 30 times Microsoft, which is a road from the table to the background, 30 times the 10 years. And HP's hardware, open to all software, their own OpenView is good, the software is not very long. Sun is the earliest, although it grew up for more than ten years, but software revenue has almost no increase. The user will give up open or not, whether it is greater, whether it is a direct relationship with the user, and the most important thing is how the user thinks. This is like a group of people to eat, if it is a à la carte (open system), very hard, time, if you say 8 people, 12 people, just say a word. Some people may say that the closed system is to let the user have no choice; maybe some people say that the closed system is locked in a system; maybe someone says ... In fact, it is not tightened, anyway, the user is saving. The user said that I am willing to lock in a system, but I don't do anything, I want to be seamlessly connected, say this system is closed, saying that this system can lock me, but in order to save time costs, I will I am willing to lock, saying that I don't care if I use a closed system. What is a plan, what is a full-scale solution, isn't it closed? Open is also what you said, "Open system advancement, closed system backward" is also what you said, how is it, let me pick it, and let me find someone to dock it, too delay time. Open and all-round solutions There are contradictory users' psychology, no reason, open system is semi-finished products, open system is impossible to be a full range of solutions, completely solved, what? Open down the next application system? Next application supplier, it is impossible to say that he is a half-position solution. Or ask which one of you choose to open the system and all-round solution? I believe that both users or vendors will choose a full range of solutions. Some people may not agree with this statement, they say that open systems and solutions are integrated, there is no contradiction. So what is the meaning of open? Since all in all are solved, what is going on? If open can give users several choices, who will pay for time cost? How to pay? Time cost is not paid, you have to upgrade. The Microsoft Windows system is because it is closed, so Success Microsoft will not recognize that he is a closed system. But if it is not closed, how does Windows and Office make programs, if Off is open, why can't you talk to Linux? SQL Server wants to open to other operating systems, is Sun Will SUN? HP does not use SQL Server with Oracle, because Oracle supports Linux, UNIX, SQL Server can support UNIX, even if support, SQL and UNIX are more powerful.
