Second question or criticism from the engine.
People in people's minds are very cattle people can do it, I don't think so, it may be because it is the engine in China. Most beginners, scattered every corner of China, lack of communication, lack of code accumulation, they may like to do game: But only before that, I can write the engine. Therefore, the number of Chinese engines is a lot, and there is a lot of energy everywhere. As far as I have seen, many engines are just Linyi MFC, or Linyi OGRE, or Linyi Torque, Irrlicht, Neo, more seem to simply encapsulate C Runtime, C , DX and Windowsapi, so that they look more in line with Your own call habit.
Oh, now I am numb to the engine. I found out that I didn't even eat the definition of the engine.
Of course, the law of human science and technology is defined after things, and now there is such a chaotic engine world, really can't grasp. The most classic definition is that the game engine is a reusable function library that helps people develop games. Perhaps this kind of definition from nonsense is only with the foot, which only comes to let the teachers of the university or educational institutions to show their skills, I can't see anything I can grasp the engine. s things. Although I laughed into the philosophy of the dogma, I still have to admire the worldview, methodology, sports law, contradictory law and other classical definitions, and one sentence, some people have clear the apple, but some people have just come and describe. Apple's appearance, but the definition of this engine? It is estimated that there is no description of the erected small tail of Apple: If a thing is not to help human or material elements to achieve a purpose, then he can't exist in this world. Going into the 21st century, if a library is not written for reuse, do you want to change an engine every time you write? !
What is the engine? Do you let me say? I don't know. However, the engine is scattered into a functional module, then check the information, fill this one of the function modules, use the design mode, to make them better organize, and then write a few License, collect the collection dependencies , Compile the library and release it, this is the engine? Future, this is the engine of many people, many Chinese engines, is also the engine I have written.
If the engine is OGRE, this is my thoughts, but even if it is used by the image in the cattle? What is the use of a person's technology? ! In the engine hundreds of thousands of modules, the image is just a module. As in the human body, the eyes are just a module. Emphasize it, myth, it is just because it is indispensable. If you have no, we are in the darkness of the day, but it is not because he is really like a myth, the world. If you just use the Doom3 graphics system, just a graphics system, or add a scene system, I still don't believe that someone can make a game like Doom3. And what did the Doom3 explain? Explain that the engine is very cattle? I spent a few years, I made a doom3, of course, this company is responsible for the game worth learning, but what is the general of this engine? The Doom3 engine can only be used as doom3, how many of the world will do for game manufacturers to make profits? ?
Is the engine easy? Easy, a large number of classes, a large number of modules, no matter what way, 揉 together, also called the engine. What is not easy, this year, someone in the year, the 2000 line code is closed, and the debug is not debugging, all right, what is it impossible? Human capacity is indeed endless, it is estimated that after 1000 years, can you travel on the surface of the sun? ! However, the engine is not a simple spring, etc., it can be solved. This is something that has not been defined. How do you go to pinch is a circle, so all China is, it is, ready to pinch. Coco Wishang (beautiful girl) makes people who love her, nothing, if there is thousands of don't love her, just prepare for her man, what will it? A industry, let thousands of people who love her, nothing; if they are just ready to use her people, what will it? These only stood on the future to tell us.
