Suppose that Wilbur, a newly hired programmer, spends his first year becoming your file converter specialist and then spends the next four years writing filters to read and write the file formats of competing products. There's no question that such work is important, but Wilbur will have gained a year's worth of real experience and then tapered off, learning little else for the next four years. Wilbur would claim that he has five years of programming experience, but that would be misleading- he would in fact have one year's experience five times Over. I feel deeply, if a person always does one or a similar project, even if he has worked for five years, but in fact it should have only one year or less experience. . From the perspective of the project, in order to keep the old people in the original working group, it is a good idea, anyone is the fastest when it is familiar with, but for programmers, this is It was a chance to expand their new ideas and learn new technologies.
Don't Allow Program Each Team Member To New Areas of The Project. Normally, when assigning work, it is natural to make people who are best at this work to do this. The reason for the project manager is: "If you don't send each job, you can do the fastest person, will you add the development time?" I think you look at what you look like this. This item is of this project. If you regard the project as a temporary task, the pursuit is a moment, then this idea is not wrong; if it is from a long-term goal, in order to cultivate talents, then you should try to get different technologies. Do not jealously hold onto your best programmers if they've stopped growing. For the good of the programmers, their replacements, and the company, transfer stalled programmers to new projects where growth can continue. Usually all the project team hope that The best, the most familiar items of the project stay in the group, but this will have no longer grow space for these people; if he changed him to other groups, find another person to replace his work, short term Inside, it is necessary to struggle, long-term, has a great advantage to the company, less a stagnant programming designer, and has two active procedures.
