Open source projects have increasing our line of sight, however, the quality of open source projects is no one. For a while, I also discussed the issue of the quality and safety of open source projects at the same time. He supports the use of open source projects. It is very simple. The participants of open source projects are "master". In his mind, the so-called master, I have no knowledge, but this view of the supporters are all. Search with "Open Source Project" and "Quality Assurance" on Google, the resulting inverted land is full of fullness, but the truly purposeful proposal is far from others. Praise and questions are so uncomfortable, I think this is the quality alarm of the open source project to ring. Praise the sound of the praise is concentrated in the following aspects: 1 Participants are based on their interests. 2 Test work is shared by the vast volunteers. 3 Participants have higher skill levels. What is even more likely to shout, never thought about the quality of the open source project. I have questioned the above points. 1 interest can ensure the work attitude and productivity of the participant, but the working time and the input of the investment cannot be guaranteed. It's hard to imagine that the programmer for a day is still sufficient to invest in the open source project. 2 Volunteers' test work is spontaneous and is always in the unplanned state. The main functions of the project may get repeated tests, while some basic or adjuvant functions (sub-modules) have not received a sufficient test and leave hidden dangers. Since the tester is different, it is possible to provide incorrect test results. 3 The technical level of the participant of open source projects is not as high as we imagined, and personal technology cannot guarantee software quality. As a result, I personally think that caution is cautious when referring to the opening source project.
